
Fall 2009
2650 Humanities
Monday 2:30pm-3:45pm
(plus weekly discussion section and weekly online activity)
Today, in an environment of web-enhanced
workplaces, schools, and shopping malls, we routinely speak of
living in an "information society". But what does this
term mean and where did it come from? How has information -- in
oral, print, broadcast, and now digital/networked forms -- been
tied to notions of democracy, capitalism, social justice, and "progress" in
American history? And if we really are living in a "postindustrial," "global," and "informational" economy
today, what does such a world mean for our understandings of our
fragmented selves, our cultural affiliations, and our social responsibilities
to each other? Through both lecture and discussion, both readings
and films, and both offline and online experiences, this course
will guide students in interrogating the information society. As
a Comm-B course
open to all majors, students will both experiment with new personal
publishing tools like text weblogs and video podcasts, and hone
more traditional skills of academic argument and presentation.
Hybrid
organization
LIS 201 is a new and somewhat experimental "hybrid" course — even
though it is meant for on-campus, full-time students, it contains
some elements of online education usually used for "distance" or
"asynchronous" learning. What this means in practice
is that our four-credit course is divided into four bite-sized
portions each week:
A
regular 75-minute lecture by the
professor every Monday. We don't take attendance in this
lecture but anything said here is fair game for quizzes and tests,
so you really should attend. Take notes, and if you miss
a day, get the notes from a friend. The professor will
post copies of lecture slides to the web site on the day
after each lecture, but these slides only summarize and do not
capture all of the content of a live lecture. And if you
bring your laptop to lecture, follow Twitter topic #uwlis201
to participate in a realtime conversation about lecture.
A
regular 75-minute discussion section each
week with your TA during the time you registered for. These
sections are capped at 18 students each, so you will get to know
your peers as you practice your public speaking and academic
writing skills. You will also discuss each week's lectures
and readings in discussion section. See the course
timetable for section times and locations.
An online
activity to be
completed each week (before the following week's live lecture). Sometimes
this will be a narrated set of slides that you download and view
much like a live lecture (except that you can do it in your pajamas). Sometimes
this might be a movie which you watch online. Other times
this might be a sort of online scavenger hunt with detailed instructions
to read, view, and explore various web resources.
An online
conversation
involving writing and peer review. Usually
you will be discussing the week's readings on a discussion section
wiki, but your TA may ask you to comment on news items, online
resources, or other topics related to the class as well. Our
online discussions and peer reviews will be hosted on the PBWorks
service.
Special note: In Fall 2009, a special graduate-student section
of LIS 201 will be held from 9:30am-10:30am on Tuesdays. It
is listed as LIS 640, "Special topics in information studies." Graduate students
in this section are expected to attend Monday lecture together
with undergraduates, and will have an extended schedule of readings
but an abbreviated schedule of assignments. (No speeches
or peer-reviewed writing assignments; basically we subtract most
of the "Comm-B" assignments.)
Electronic
resources
As a hybrid course, LIS 201 utilizes many new
media technologies. We
do this both to deliver the class in a way that alters the traditional
space-time relations of education (allowing you to participate
at a distance, or at odd hours, or asynchronously, or through written
text) and to expose students to some of the many collaborative
online tools in use today.
We choose "outside" tools
on purpose -- we want you to become familiar with systems "at
large"
in the world, not just at Madison. Sometimes these tools
may not work as well as we would like; we should consider these
moments of reflection, not frustration.
Please note that most of
these tools are publicly visible, so students (and instructors)
should keep alert: practice a civil and respectful tone, and be
aware when you might be revealing personally identifiable information.
This class-wide
web page, listing
the assignments and schedule for the whole semester, constantly
updated with new content and links as the weeks go by. Produced
using Adobe Dreamweaver and hosted at the UW-Madison School
of Journalism & Mass Communication (just because that's where
I keep all my class web sites, regardless of department). You
will want to bookmark this web page in your browser, and use
it as a regular reference!
A class-wide news
blog (at lis201.blogspot.com) for
the professor and TAs to post class-wide issues and
news articles related to the topic of the class. (Students
may comment on anything we put here.) Produced and hosted
using Blogger.
A class-wide file repository storing
electronic versions of the required and optional readings, as
well as downloadable files and video associated with each week's
online lectures. Produced and hosted using UW Madison MyWebSpace.
TA-led discussion
section wikis for students
to use in peer review critiques of polished drafts and podcast
speeches. Produced
and hosted using PBWorks. (This
one is not publicly visible, so only your classmates and the
instructors will see your polished drafts and podcast speeches.)
Personal student
file repositories
which students can use to upload digital images
and videos which they want to share with the rest of the class. Produced
and hosted using UW Madison MyWebSpace.
Personal student blogs where
each student will create an online persona which later someone
will read and view
to try to discern information about your true self. Produced
and hosted using WordPress.
Obviously, taking a class with all of these electronic
tools means you will need to have regular access to a computer.
All of the UW dorms have their own computer labs, and you
may also use the College
Library computer lab.
There are plenty
of other software tools available on campus for producing and consuming
online content. Check
out the DoIT
software training for students web site for ideas.
Grading
There are 100 points available in this course:
- One four-minute prepared
oral presentation summarizing
an article from your reader, in
discussion section -
5 points.
- One two minute extemporaneous
oral response to another student's prepared oral presentation
on that week's
reader article, in discussion section - 5 points.
- One 500-word written
critique of a
different article from your reader, posted to your discussion section
wiki - 5 points.
- One four-minute video
or narrated slideshow
presentation presenting a key argument from an outside
book that you read, posted to your discussion section wiki-
10 points.
- A 1000-word written
review of that
book, posted to your discussion section wiki - 5 points.
- Two 1000-word written
papers, posted to your discussion section wiki - 10 points
each (20 points total).
- Several 250-word peer
reviews of other students written papers, entered
as comments on your discussion section wiki - 5 points each
assignment (10 points total)
- Ten quizzes on
readings or lecture, in
discussions section - 1 point each (10 points total).
- A midterm exam
based on readings and lecture, involving
both short answer and essay questions -
10 points.
- A final exam based
on readings and lecture,
involving both short answer and essay questions - 10 points
- Overall participation in
discussion section, both in-person and online - 10 points.
Discussion
sections
LIS 201 relies on six instructors: the professor
plus five paid graduate teaching assistants (TAs). Each TA
manages two discussion sections of up to 18 students a piece (the
professor only manages one). Both the professor and the TAs
hold regular in-person office hours.
Each of these discussion sections
has its own wiki, where students
can assemble and present the materials relating to their readings,
papers, peer reviews, and movies.
We encourage students to communicate with us through
email; however, please compose your email as if you were writing
a short letter or office memo, and not as if you were text-messaging
a friend. You should plan on at most a 48-hour turn-around
on emails (longer over weekends).
WIKI |
DAY/TIME |
ROOM |
TA |
| 301 |
Tues. 11:00 - 12:15 |
Humanities 2231 |
Greg Downey |
| 302 |
Thurs. 11:00 - 12:15 |
Vilas 4011 |
Jennifer Huck |
| 303 |
Tues. 9:30 - 10:45 |
Humanities 2211 |
Katy Tomlinson Kavanagh |
| 304 |
Tues. 11:00 - 12:15 |
Humanities 2241 |
Katy Tomlinson Kavanagh |
| 305 |
Tues. 4:00 - 5:15 |
HC White 4275 |
Chris Bocast |
| 306 |
Wed. 9:30 - 10:45 |
Humanities 2261 |
Emily Johnson |
| 307 |
Thurs. 9:30 - 10:45 |
Humanities 2115 |
Jennifer Huck |
| 308 |
Thurs. 11:00 - 12:15 |
Babcock 119 |
Darcy Gervasio |
| 309 |
Wed. 4:00 - 5:15 |
HC White 4275 |
Chris Bocast |
| 310 |
Thurs. 4:00 - 5:15 |
HC White 4275 |
Emily Johnson |
| 311 |
Tues. 11:00 - 12:15 |
Humanities 2619 |
Darcy Gervasio |
Texts
to purchase
There is no textbook for this course. Instead,
we will read key articles on the information society selected by
the instructor. We
have produced a xeroxed (non-profit) "reader" for you to
purchase from ASM Student
Print containing most of these articles.
The reader should cost about $35, which is half to one-third the
cost of a standard textbook. You
can expect anywhere from 25-75 pages of reading (two articles) each
week.
UW-Madison students may also download
any of the required or optional readings as PDF files (you
will need your standard UW NetID login and password to enter) by
clicking on these icons: However,
all students are expected to bring a paper copy of each week's
readings to discussion section.
You will use the articles in this reader as the
basis for your speech assignments, below. Information from
the articles will also appear on exams.
NB: These articles were not chosen to be “unbiased” texts
or to be the final word on the information society.
Rather, I have picked these articles with three goals in mind: they
are readable and interesting while still scholarly; they are relevant
to current events; and, often, they are polemical in that they argue
for a particular interpretation of the world which you may choose
to agree with or to disagree with.
Book
to purchase
Besides two articles each week from your
course reader, each student will choose and read a full-length
book dealing with the information society. Your
book may be either fiction or non-fiction, but it needs to be a
substantial and serious work. You will choose your book as
part of your online assignment during week 06 of the course.
Because
several students may decide to choose the same book and local
libraries may not have enough copies, you should plan on purchasing
this book (which will likely cost about $15). You may
wish to order this book through a local independent bookstore (like
the University Bookstore or Rainbow
Books) or through an online
bookseller (like Amazon).
You will use your book as the basis for your movie
assignment and your third writing assignment, below.
Speech
assignments
Practicing oral communication skills is an important
part of a Comm-B course. In LIS 201 you will perform
two in-class presentations: one prepared four-minute speech, and
one extemporaneous (unrehearsed) two-minute response to another student's
speech. Each
of these will be based on your readings for that week.
Your
TA will assign you a number during your first discussion section;
use this number to figure out which week you will be presenting your
prepared speech. You will be called on randomly for your extemporaneous
speech.
Prepared speech
The prepared speech is a four-minute summary and
critique of one of the articles your class is discussing from the
course reader that week.
You should devote the first part of your presentation
(2 minutes) to identifying the main arguments of the reading, outlining
the author's claims, reasons, and evidence. You do not have to go
into great detail (since all students will have read the article)
but you do have to provide an accurate summary.
The rest of your
presentation (2 minutes) should deal with your reaction to the reading.
You need to make your own claim and your reason for that claim, providing
evidence to support it. Like a good paper, your talk needs a short
introduction and a satisfying conclusion.
Do not read your presentation! You may speak from
simple notes that keep you on track, but allow the words to emerge
spontaneously and conversationally. A good strategy is to practice
your presentation in front of a mirror, a voice recorder, or a friend.
While you are making your presentation, your TA
will designate a fellow student to record you on a little digital
video camera. Later,
your TA will post this video on the discussion section wiki page
for the reading you reviewed. You
are required to view your performance and perform a self-critique:
reply to your TA with one way that you could improve your delivery
next time.
You will also need to post a written outline of
your presentation to the discussion section wiki page for the article
you are presenting.
Extemporaneous speech
The extemporaneous speech is a two-minute reaction
to another student's prepared speech.
Your reply should both summarize and acknowledge
what the student said about the article (1 minute) and then critique
what that student said, offering your own ideas (1 minute).
Remember,
though, that "critique" doesn't necessarily mean "criticize." Explain
whether you agree or disagree with the student's assessment of the
article, and why. Or you may suggest a different way of understanding
or interpreting the article, contrasting it with what the first student
said.
This is not an easy assignment — you only have
two minutes. Try to be constructive, civil, and, above all,
concise.
Evaluation criteria for speeches
All TAs use the same oral
presentation grading sheet and grade your speeches according
to both content and delivery.
Content
- Do you accurately capture what the author (or previous speaker)
was saying?
- Is your own claim clear?
- Is your evidence for your claim convincing?
- Have you uploaded a written outline?
Delivery
- Have you kept to the time specified?
- Are you loud enough to be heard?
- Does your inflection and emphasis help convey your meaning (as
in normal conversation)?
- Are you, like, avoiding the use of slang and, basically, all
those crutch phrases like "like" and "basically"?
- Do you seem to be enjoying yourself (even if you aren't)?
Writing
assignments
You will write three 1000-word (four-page) papers for this
class. Even though these papers are short, they should still each have
the three basic components of an academic essay:
- An introduction which clearly states a thesis (and please
underline that thesis).
- A body which develops the thesis, with one
argument per paragraph.
- A conclusion which not only restates the
thesis, but leaves the reader with something more.
For
the first two papers, you will write a polished draft and post
it to your personal discussion
section wiki page. Then you will receive TA and peer
feedback, and only after this feedback will you write a final draft.
For the third paper, you will not use the peer review process.
(1) Critiquing the information society
During the first part of this course, you were
assigned several readings which discussed the promise and peril of
a society tied to information and communication infrastructures in
broad terms.
For this paper, choose one
specific information or communication technology (digital television,
a weekly newspaper, the Play Station Portable, billboards on buses — be
creative!) and use at least two scholarly
articles to analyze that technology,
making an argument about how that technology interacts with society
and how it exemplifies or refutes the notion of an "control"
or "postindustrial" or "network" society.
In other words, your paper should answer the questions:
What primary purpose does your information or communication technology
serve? Which
concept of an information society — a control revolution, postindustrial
economy, or network society — can you use to analyze this technology? Does
your technology — and the way it is promoted, used, or
even ignored by humans — support or refute this notion
of an information society?
Please note that this paper cannot rest simply on your opinions.
Your arguments must be drawn from ideas presented in the articles
you use, and your evidence should be specific to the media product
you chose. You
may use articles from your reader, articles form the "optional
readings"
on this web site, or articles you find on your own.
(2) Connecting technology to social goals
In the second part of this course, through lecture
and readings we are discussing the way online culture connects to
various social processes: recreation and work, education and
warfare.
For this paper, pick
any web site you like and use at least two scholarly
articles to
analyze that web site, including its purpose, its audience, its social
function, and its relation to democratic, economic, educational,
or cultural goals.
We are intentionally giving you more freedom and
less guidance on this paper. However, you may want to consider:
What formerly offline social processes does your chosen web site
attempt to adapt or encompass?
What are the greatest benefits and the greatest risks to society
as such social activity moves online?
(3) Reviewing a book on the information society
For your last paper, you will write an analytical
book review of the information society book you chose to read.
An analytical book review is not simply a description
of the author's writing style and whether or not you found the book
interesting. Instead, you must succinctly and accurately
describe the main thesis of the book,
and tell us whether the author has effectively used evidence and
argument to convince you of that thesis.
For this paper, you should cite at least
one outside scholarly review of your book (which you should have
located when you first picked your book) and you should use
at least one scholarly article to help you analyze your book. (Again,
you may choose from the articles in your reader, articles in
the "optional
readings"
on this web site, or articles you find on your own.)
You do not post a rough draft of this paper to
the wiki; you only post the final draft.
Guidelines for rough drafts
- A rough draft is a complete draft; fragments or outlines will
not be accepted.
- Underline your thesis statement.
- Clearly separate your paragraphs
either through indentation or a blank line.
- Include a short bullet-point outline with your draft. (You
may want to reverse-outline your paper.)
- Properly cite your sources within the text of the paper.
- Include
a properly formatted list of references at the end.
- Proofread your draft!
- Post your rough draft to the discussion section wiki on your
personal wiki page. You may want to create a separate sub-page
for each draft, so that your peer reviewers can easily comment
on it. Just copy the text from your word processor directly
into this wiki page.
Guidelines for final papers
- Underline your thesis statement.
- Use one-inch margins on all
sides
- Double-space all text.
- Indent all paragraphs; no extra blank lines between paragraphs.
- Use 12-point Times, Times
Roman, or Times New Roman font.
- Number your pages.
- Put your name and your TA's name on the first
page.
- Turn in a one-page outline with each draft.
- Turn in a one-page
list of references with each draft (APA
style).
- Staple all pages
(no paperclips or corner folds).
- Proofread your final paper!
Instantly boost your writing grade!
- Proofread.
- “Simplify, simplify, simplify!” Use clear,
direct, and concise wording.
- Do not be redundant. Do not say things
twice in a different way just to add words.
- Present your arguments
in the paper in the same order that you lay them out in the thesis.
(Your outline can help you here.)
- Check out these "nine
rules for good writing" and test yourself
on these writing exercises.
- Did we mention proofreading?
Never, never, never do!
- When referring to a work of nonfiction, never
use the word “novel” – this
implies a work of fiction and will cause your TA to wince uncontrollably.
- Never begin your conclusion with “In conclusion” or “To
conclude” or “By way of concluding, ready or not, here
I go” ...
- Never use slang in your writing, daddy-o; that is
meg bad.
- Never try to entertain your reader with asides, puns, and
witty comments (unless you are writing a course web site).
Citing outside sources
In each paper you are expected to use scholarly articles (from your
reader, from the optional readings on this web site, or from your
own literature search) to support your arguments. You need to cite
these outside articles whenever you use an idea, quote, or fact from
these sources. We recommend APA
style when citing sources in LIS
201 papers:
- In the text of the paper, use the author's last name, the year
of publication, and the page number, like this: (Gitlin, 2002,
p. 10)
- In the list of references at the end, organize alphabetically
by author last name, like this: Gitlin, T. (2002). Media
unlimited: How the torrent of images and sounds overwhelms our
lives. New
York: Henry Holt and Co.
- For all the details on APA style see this
summary and sample paper documented in APA style.
If it is
not your idea, cite it. Failure to properly cite outside sources
is plagiarism and academic dishonesty and may be grounds for failing
both the assignment and the course.
And please remember, wikipedia entries and random
blog posts do not count as "scholarly articles" (though they may
point you to more authoritative and useful resources).
Evaluation criteria for all papers
All TAs use the same written
grading sheet covering
the following criteria:
1. Following instructions. Does your paper follow
the instructions of the assignment? Was it turned in on time? Does
it conform to our formatting guidelines?
2. Grammar and style. Do you avoid grammatical, spelling,
and usage errors? Do you have any run-on sentences or non-sentences?
Are your sentences clear and concise? Are references in correct APA
style?
3. Thesis and structure. Does your introduction contain
a clear thesis (underlined)? Does your conclusion end with a compelling
idea? Do arguments and examples build logically in between, following
your outline?
4. Use of sources. Does your paper demonstrate that
you understand the examples and arguments from the articles you use?
Does your thesis deal with the central arguments rather than peripheral
issues?
5. Arguments and evidence. Do you support your thesis
with compelling evidence and arguments? Do you counter at least one
possible argument against your answer?
6. Creativity and difficulty. Finally, remember that
we appreciate papers which find exemplary outside sources, represent
an unusual challenge, take on a unique case, or come up with a creative
point of view.
Finding scholarly articles
In order to find an authoritative outside source,
you should use the resources available at our campus libraries. For
example, you can search for academic journal research articles in
the ProQuest
Research Library or in UW-Madison QuickSearch
for Articles. Your TA may suggest other research techniques
in class. And the library hosts a series of online tutorials
called "CLUE" which can introduce you to ways of finding books
and journal articles here on campus.
Getting help from the Writing Center
Our campus is lucky to have a top-notch and easily-accessible Writing
Center which is free for all students to use. The Writing Center
is located on the 6th floor of Helen C. White Hall (the same building
as the College Library). You should all feel free to get assistance
from the Writing Center staff on any of your three papers. Visit
them online too.
Peer
reviews
Your TA will divide each section into groups of
three to six students for peer reviews. You will review the
rough drafts of the other students in your peer review group,
and they will each review your rough drafts.
Peer reviews are to be posted on the discussion
section wiki on the same page the rough draft of each student you
are reviewing. Each
review should include both things the author did well and things
the author still needs to work on. Which does the student need
to work on more, writing style and grammar or argument and evidence?
Each peer review should be at least 250 words.
These peer reviews will not be
anonymous, so you should take care to offer constructive
criticism (the same kind of criticism you would like to
see someone offer on your paper).
Movie
assignment
Besides completing a written review of your book,
one of your assignments is to take an idea from this book and communicate
it using either a four-minute narrated slideshow or a four-minute
digital movie.
Preparing and narrating a slideshow
There are many ways to use slideshow programs like Microsoft PowerPoint
or Apple Keynote effectively. There are even more ways to use
them ineffectively. If you choose to illustrate an idea from
your book using a narrated slideshow, you will use a very scripted
and effective format for that slideshow, called "Ignite."
In an Ignite presentation, you have a pre-set amount of time to
work through a pre-set number of slides, each of which advances automatically. So
if you get four minutes for your presentation, you get 16 slides,
which cross the screen at a rate of one every 15 seconds. (A
normal Ignite presentation is five minutes with 20 slides, but
we're giving you a bit of a break.)
Usually in an Ignite presentation, people try to choose slides with
interesting images or charts on them, and talk their way through
explaining each one in turn. This avoids the common slideshow
pitfall of simply creating slides full of words and then reading
the words out loud.
Most modern slide programs have a feature allowing you to record
an audio narration to a slideshow. You may need a friend's
help to click the "next slide" button at the appropriate time (every
fifteen seconds). Don't worry if at the end you're a little
under or over four minutes.
Recording and editing a movie
Instead of a slideshow, you may choose to illustrate
an idea from your book by making a complete four-minute digital movie.
You may very well have a computer, cell phone, or other gadget
which can record digital video. If
you like, you may use this device as long as it records in any of
the standard video formats (like "Quicktime" or "Windows
Media")
that can be easily played through most web browsers.
If
you do not have your own digital video recorder, you may check out
a nice little easy-to-use Flip
Video recorder from the SLIS
Laboratory Library on the 4th floor of Helen
C. White. (We currently have sixteen of these; tell them
you're an LIS 201 student.) These
cameras may be checked out, using your normal university ID, for
three days at a time. They run on AA batteries which you will
have to supply if they run out. (For more on how to use the Flip
Video cameras, see their technical
support page.)
Please be aware: If you check out one of
these cameras, you are responsible for treating it with care and
returning it in clean and usuable condition. By
entrusting the class with $200 digital video cameras, or with any
other shared resource, I am fully expecting you to behave as responsible
adults and treat this equipment (and its subsequent users) with
respect, just as you would in a corporate internship or entry-level
job.
Movies can be a little complicated to shoot and
edit, so if you would like to team up with a fellow student to complete
this assignment, that's fine; however, no matter how much you help each
other out in pairs or in groups, each
student must turn in their own, unique movie based on the book they
have read.
Uploading your slideshow or movie
After you have recorded either a movie or a slideshow,
upload it to your discussion
section wiki and place a link to it on your personal wiki page. Then
spend some time watching the movies of your classmates to decide
which one you like the best!
Special
needs
Persons with disabilities are to be fully included
in thiscourse. Please let me know if you need any special accommodations
to enable you to fully participate. I will try to maintain confidentiality
of the information you share with me. To request academic accomodations,
please register with the McBurney
Disability Resource Center.
Academic
honesty
Academic honesty requires that the course work a
student presents to an instructor honestly and accurately indicates
the student's own academic efforts. If you are unsure about what
qualifies as academic dishonesty, please consult the Academic
Misconduct Guide for Students. Two points in particular
to keep in mind:
- copying or paraphrasing material from books, articles,
or web pages without proper quotation and citation is plagiarism
- copying or paraphrasing material from fellow students
is plagiarism
Please remember that any plagiarism
may be sufficient grounds for failing a student in the entire course.
Classroom
respect
The
UW-Madison is committed to creating a dynamic, diverse and welcoming
learning environment for all students and has a non-discrimination
policy that reflects this philosophy. To be disrespectful in behavior
or comments addressed towards any group or individual, regardless
of race/ethnicity, sexuality, gender, religion, ability, or any
other difference is unacceptable in this class, and will
be addressed publicly by the professor.
Laptop
policy
I believe that in the modern university, and especially in a class
on the information society, laptops, PDAs, and other digital devices
can be acceptable student tools for notetaking and realtime online
research in the lecture hall.
However, with ubiquitous, broadband,
wireless Internet connections,
laptops also pose a unique temptation to inattention and disrespect,
providing the ability to check Facebook, shop for vintage Star Wars
minifigures, or play Kingdom of Loathing while someone else is spending
time and money to provide you with a quality educational experience. And
you need to realize that what seems like private web-browsing to
you appears like an
effective 32" television screen of distraction to the students sitting
close beside and behind you.
Because of this, I have several
rules for laptops in lecture:
- The front few rows of the lecture hall will be laptop-free zones. Students
who wish to listen and take notes by hand should not have to stare
at your glossy LED widescreen.
- If you wish to spend the whole lecture surfing the web, please
skip class instead. You wouldn't come to lecture and sit
hidden behind a printed newspaper for 75 minutes, would you? Show
us the same respect with your laptop.
- If you have your laptop online during lecture, make use of that
wifi connection for course purposes. Fact-check what I'm
saying and raise your hand if you find an alternative explanation
or point of view. Offer up additional information or questions. Or
follow the topic #uwlis201 on Twitter to engage in a realtime side-conversation
on the lecture.
- Donate your extra laptop processor power to a useful research
cause. Download the free BOINC research software and mobilize
your computer's in-between processor cycles to help scientists
fold proteins, decode DNA sequences, or search the universe for
ET.
Military
call-ups
We recognize that those students serving in the armed
forces may be called to active duty at any time. The university
has posted guidelines
for students who are called to duty detailing options for withdrawing
from, dropping, or completing courses. In general, students
called to military service may receive credit for this class if leaving
after the midway point of the course, at the discretion of the instructor,
based on the student's earned grade up to the time of departure.
About
the professor
Greg
Downey <gdowney @ wisc.edu> is a professor
with a 50 percent appointment in the School of Journalism and
Mass Communication and a 50 percent appointment in the School
of Library and Information Studies. His teaching and research
both center on the history and geography of information and communication
technology and the often hidden human labor behind it.
Downey joined the UW faculty in 2001. He holds a
B.S. and M.S. in computer science from the University of Illinois,
Champaign-Urbana, an M.A. In liberal studies from Northwestern University,
and a joint Ph.D. in history of technology and human geography from
the Johns Hopkins University. Before coming to Madison, Downey spent
a year as a postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Geography and
the Humanities Institute at the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.
His industry experience as a computer analyst includes
three years at the Leo Burnett advertising agency in Chicago, and
three years at Roger Schank’s Institute for Learning Sciences
at Northwestern University. He has held short-term volunteer positions
with both the Center for Neighborhood Technology in Chicago and the
Community Information Exchange in Washington D.C. And he used
to draw a daily comic strip when he was an undergraduate, believe
it or not.
 Downey's
first book, Telegraph Messenger Boys: Labor, Technology, and
Geography, 1850-1950, was published by Routledge in 2002. His
second book, Closed captioning: Subtitling, stenography, and
the digital convergence of text with television, was published
by Johns Hopkins in 2008. He is currently working on his third
book, a history and geography of library labor and technology in
the US over the 20th century.
Downey is currently the Director of the UW-Madison
School of Journalism and Mass Communication.
Troubleshooting
We use a lot of technology in this class and sometimes it might
not work as expected. Here are some tips (this list will probably
grow over time, so check back):
- If a video file won't play in your browser, remember you can
download it to your hard drive (or to a USB drive) and try to play
it outside of your browser, using free video playback software
like QuickTime, Windows
Media Player, or RealPlayer. On the
Mac, usually you CTRL-click to bring up a download menu; on Windows,
it's usually a right-click on the mouse.
- If a video file still won't play, you may have to install the
"3ivx" QuickTime plugin. You can download this here for
both Windows and Mac computers.
- To shrink the size of your video file before you upload it, note
that the Flip software does have a "save
for email" option
that allows you to save the file as a smaller one in .wmv format.
For example, a 57MB .avi video file (about 4.5 minutes) can be
compressed to a 18MB .wmv file. It takes a long time though - about
18 minutes. (And Mac users may need this
free software to
play .wmv files in QuickTime.) Other video programs which
may have come with your computer — such as Windows Movie
Maker or iMovie
— can probably be used to do the same thing.
- When posting to UW
MyWebSpace accounts, remember that there is
a 1
GB file limit and a 400
MB per hour bandwidth limit (upload/download
limit per hour). The image and video files that you will be
uploading and downloading should fall below these limits, but if
you run into problems, email your TA for assistance.
- Remember that students are responsible for replacing batteries
in the Flip Video cameras.
- If you encountera a technical glitch, first try to work through
it yourself; but if that doesn't work, email your TA for assistance.
|
|
Announcement: Spring course of interest for LIS 201 students
Computer Science 202 Introduction to Computation Meets 1:20 – 2:10 Mon, Wed, Fri (3 Cr) Instructor: Professor Andrea Arpaci-Dusseau
Would you like to understand how computers work? Do you want to know how to use computation to solve problems?
Designed for a diverse audience, CS 202 focuses on understanding algorithms, step-by-step methods for accomplishing a complex task. Algorithms are useful in more places than you might imagine. Algorithms specify the work that must be done for large, complex tasks like sequencing the human genome. But, algorithms also describe how people approach everyday problems like finding a path out of a maze or solving a rubik's cube. Understanding how to solve problems in a step-by-step fashion is useful for more than just computer scientists. In this course, you'll investigate the types of problems we currently know how to solve with computation and you'll compare different algorithms that solve the same problem to determine which are the most efficient.
In this course, you’ll also learn how modern computers perform computation. For example, you’ll understand how hardware and software store data, run applications, and display and find web pages. You’ll learn about a wide range of areas in computer science, such as robotics, human-computer interaction, and artificial intelligence.
To obtain hands-on experience with algorithms, we will be using a new programming environment called Scratch. Scratch enables beginners to create sophisticated programs by simply dragging and dropping predefined instruction blocks. Thus, you will acquire experience decomposing problems into well-defined steps without the fear of frustrating ``syntax'' errors. You will use Scratch to create animated stories, art, and educational games!
All majors are welcome!
For more information, please see: http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~dusseau/Classes/CS202/
Previous news ...
Extra credit opportunity #2Extra credit opportunityEssay questions for the midtermShort answer terms for the midtermA new kind of anti-information-society space |
August
31 2009 |
|
WEEK
01 |
Preparing to study
the information society
Lecture
Since our lectures are held on Mondays
but classes don't start until Wednesday September 02, there
will be NO live lecture this week.
- Instead, please watch this short
introductory video from Professor Downey.
(5
minutes) 
- You
may want to learn more about me at my personal
web site. (Or you may not care.)
- Make sure to read through this whole
LIS 201 course web site (bookmark it in your web browser) so
you know what to expect from this very unusual and very labor-intensive
course!
- Please acquire the xeroxed course reader from ASM
Student Print.
Discussion
Since many discussions sections are
held on Tuesdays but classes don't start until Wednesday
September 02, there will be NO discussion sections this week.
- Instead, your TA will email you to introduce him/herself
sometime this week.
- Rather than participating in a discussion this week, please
take this
short
web survey on how much technology you've used in the classroom.

Online
This week you'll learn how to use our wiki service, PBWorks, to
access and post to your discussion section wiki.
- After your TA emails an introduction to you, you'll receive
an emailed invitation to your discussion
section wiki. Just follow the directions to become
a member of the wiki.
- Notice that when you first go to your wiki home page (called
the "front page"), the tab at
the top indicates that you are in "VIEW" mode.
In
a moment, we will EDIT this front page.
- On the front page of your discussion section wiki, your TA
has created a big table listing all of the students in your
section. You will create a wiki page for yourself and
link it to your name in this table.
- At the top of the wiki front page, click the "EDIT" tab. This
brings the wiki into Editing mode.

Notice that there
is now a familiar-looking toolbar of editing tools at the top
of the page.

Be careful; you are live-editing the
front page of your section wiki. (If you mess something
up, just hit "Cancel" at the bottom of the wiki page
and try again.)
- Highlight your name and click the little "make a link"
icon in the toolbar:
- This
brings up a window where you can specify what you want that
text to link to.
For "Link type," choose "PBWorks Page"
(the default). For "Page," choose "--New
Page--"
(the default). Finally, for "Page Name," notice
that PBWorks has defaulted to the text you selected (your name)
as the name of the new page. Add the words "personal
wiki page" to the end of this and then click "OK".
- The text you selected has now been changed in color to look
like a normal web link. Go ahead and hit "Save" at
the bottom of the wiki page

to save your edits.
- Now, in "VIEW" mode once again, find your name with the link
you just created and click on it to try to go to the wiki page
that has been created for you.
- Aha! The wiki has figured out that you "linked" to
a page that does not exist yet, so it's asking you to create
this page first. Go ahead and click the "Create page"
button to do this.

Now you have a blank wiki page all your own.
- Click "EDIT" at the top of your wiki page to add
some text and introduce yourself. Maybe
describe where you're from and what your favorite Star Wars(tm)
Collectible Action Figure is. (Or not.) Anyway,
write at least 250 words. After you're done, click "Save" at
the bottom to
see your changes added to the wiki page.
- Now try to upload a digital photo of yourself to the
wiki. On
the upper-right-hand-side of the wiki page, find the link to
"Upload files" and click on it.

This takes
you to a page listing all the extra word processing, image,
sound, and video files that have been uploaded to this wiki.
- On this page, click the "Upload files" button

and you will
be presented with a file browser dialog box where you can pick
a file from your computer to upload. Find a nice digital
photo of yourself (not too large, please) and upload it.
- Now that your image is uploaded to the wiki, navigate back
to your personal wiki page and "EDIT". On the
right-hand side of the wiki page you'll see a tab for "Images
and files."

Click this and you should see the image
you just uploaded in the list.
- Click on the title of your image and it will be inserted
into your wiki page. Click "Save" at the bottom of your
wiki page when you are satisfied with how the image looks.
- Finally, visit the personal wiki page of another student
in your section and post a friendly "comment" to
the bottom of their page.
- If you run into trouble signing on to the wiki, creating
your personal page, editing and saving text, or uploading an
image, ask a classmate to help you or talk to your TA.
Readings
This week's readings cover tools you will use all semester
long to improve your writing and speaking skills.
- Wayne C. Booth, Gregory G. Colomb, and
Joseph M. Williams, The craft of research, 2nd ed.
(2003), selections.

- Laurie Rozakis, The complete idiot's guide to public speaking (1999),
selections.

Optional:
- Wayne C. Booth, Gregory G. Colomb, and Joseph
M. Williams, "Planning and drafting [ch. 12]," "Revising
your organization and argument [ch. 13]," "Introductions
and conclusions [ch. 14]," and "Revising style [ch. 16]"
The craft
of research, 2nd ed. (2003). 
- Anne Lamott, "Shitty first drafts" (1994).

- Brandon Royal, The little red writing
book (2004), selections.

- Stephen E. Lucas, The art of public speaking, 6th
ed. (1998),
selections. 
|
September
07 2009 |
|
WEEK
02 |
Technology and social change
Lecture
Since our lectures
are held on Mondays but classes are cancelled for Labor Day,
there will be no live lecture this week either! (Isn't
this the strangest class you've ever had?)
- Instead, please watch this prerecorded lecture by Professor
Downey. Topic: Thinking about technology and information.
(40
minutes) 
Discussion
Finally, discussion sections meet this week.
- Meet your TA and your fellow students in person! (Your TA may have
you create a "table tent" to help everybody learn names.)
- Discuss the syllabus and grading.
- Your TA will assign you to specific weeks and readings for
your prepared oral presentations and your written article reviews. (You
won't know when you'll be called upon to do your extemporaneous oral presentations.)
These will all be listed on your section wiki.
- Discuss techniques for effective oral presentations.
- Discuss this week's lecture and required readings.
Online
This week you will prepare a personal weblog using the WordPress weblog service.
- This is a blog that you will be using as your own public space all through
the semester. Near the end of the term, another student will be assigned
to read your blog and try to figure out something about you based on your
blog identity. You may try to keep it real or fake them out --
your choice.
- Visit www.wordpress.com and click "Sign up now" to create your
own weblog. (You will need to supply a login ID and email address to
do this.) You may want to use your real name as your ID, or you
may want to use a pseudonym so that your real name is not made visible to
the world. Your choice.
- You may want to use
your real name in your blog address (where you fill in _____.wordpress.com) and/or
title, or you may want to use a pseudonym. Again, your choice.
- Post something good to your new blog to get things rolling!
- Your
assignment from now to the end of the semester is to post something, anything,
at least once a week on this blog. (But you may write more if
you are inspired.)
- If you run into trouble signing on to the weblog, posting and commenting,
or uploading and linking an image, either ask a classmate to help you or
email your TA.
Readings
You need to have these readings completed by the time you get
to discussion section each week, in order to be able to discuss them
with your TA and fellow students. We may quiz you on
this readings as well.
- Donald MacKenzie and Judy Wajcman, "Introductory essay," in The
social shaping of technology, 2nd ed. (1999).

- Paul Edwards, "Infrastructure and modernity: Force,
time, and social organization in the history of sociotechnical
systems,"
in Thomas J. Misa et al. eds., Modernity and technology (2003).
Optional:
- Merritt Roe Smith, "Technological determinism in American
culture,"
in Merritt Roe Smith and Leo Marx, eds., Does technology
drive
history? The dilemma of technological determinism (1994). 
- Andrew Chadwick, "Some conceptual tools,"
in Internet politics: States, citizens, and new communication
technologies (2006).

- Stephen Lubar, "Introduction," in Infoculture:
The Smithsonian book of information age inventions (1993).

- David E. Nye, "Critics of technology," in Carroll
Pursell, ed., A
companion to American technology (2005). 
- Langdon Winner, "Do artifacts have politics?"
(1986) in Donald MacKenzie and Judy Wajcman, eds., The
social shaping of technology,
2nd ed. (1999).

- Alfred D. Chandler jr., "The information age in historical
perspective," in Alfred D. Chandler jr. and James W.
Cortada, eds., A nation transformed by information: How
information has shaped the United States from colonial times
to the present (2000).

- Susan J. Douglas, "The turn within: The irony of technology
in a globalized world," American Quarterly (2006).

Please note that the Wednesday of
the second week of class is generally the last day to drop
without a "DR" on
your transcript. (You can still drop through the ninth week
of class but there will be a notation on the transcript.) |
September
14 2009 |
|
WEEK
03 |
Print culture and literacy
Lecture
Finally, lecture meets this week! Students are expected to attend all in-person lectures and take
notes. Within 24 hours of each in-person lecture, I'll link
a PDF version of any slides I showed in lecture next to the lecture
title (click on the little icon).
- Topic: Three information societies

Discussion
- First five minutes: Quiz 01 on the readings or the
lecture!
- Two student presentations, one on each of the readings (and
two student extemporaneous responses). Your TA will designate
a classmate to record your presentations on digital video. The
recording will be uploaded to the discussion section wiki on
the page for the article you discussed; after watching the
recording, you must respond to your TA with one substantive
way in which you could improve your delivery.
- Discuss this week's lecture and required readings.
- Discuss tasks and strategies for paper #1. (Rough draft
due on wiki by start of next week's discussion.)
- After discussion section: Remember to post
to your personal WordPress blog.
Online
Starting with this week, each week you will have an online
research and exploration exercise. Each of these "scavenger
hunts" will
require you to write something about your experience at the
end on your discussion section wiki.
Each
one should take between 45-90 minutes to complete.
This week's online lecture begins with an exhibit at the Smithsonian
National Postal Museum on a World War II technological information
system known as "V-Mail."
- Visit
the main
V-mail web site and read through the introductory
material. Spend
some time exploring this site, taking notes both on the
social purposes of V-mail and the information/communication
technologies needed to make V-mail work.
- Make sure
to try the "V-Mail
service in action"
interactive portion and view the V-Mail
newsreel from 1944. Would you argue that V-mail
was a success?
- Now spend some time searching for the ways that soldiers
communicate with the homefront today. See if you
can track down a "milblog" (military weblog)
written by a soldier about his or her experiences in Iraq,
Afghanistan, or elsewhere around the globe.
- For another written view on the war in Iraq, check out
the last few entries from the "Baghdad
Burning" weblog where an Iraqi woman wrote about
her experiences during the war for several years.
- Go to your discussion section wiki and post something
about what you've found. You may want to create a separate
wiki page for this so that others can easily comment on it.
- Reply to a fellow student's
post on this online lecture activity as well.
- Please finish this online activity by next week's lecture.
Readings
Have these read by the time you get to section this week!
- Deborah Brandt, "Accumulating literacy: How four generations
of one American family learned to write," in Literacy
in American lives (2001).

- JoAnne Yates, "Communication technology and the growth
of internal communication," in Control through communication:
The rise of system in American management (1989).

Optional:
- Richard D. Brown, "Early American origins of the information
age" (2000).

- David Levy, "A bit of digital history," in Scrolling
forward: Making sense of documents in the digital age (2001).

- Walter Ong, "Orality, literacy, and modern media" (1982).

- John B. Thompson, "The digital revolution and the publishing
world," in Books in the digital age: The transformation
of academic and higher education publishing in Britain and
the United States (2005).

|
September
21 2009 |
|
WEEK
04 |
The electromechanical control revolution
Lecture
- Make sure your online activity from last week is finished
by today.
- Topic: The control revolution and "modernity"

Discussion
- Before section meets this week: Post
your rough draft of paper #1 to your personal wiki pages (create
a separate subpage so that your peer reviewers can just "comment"
at the bottom).
- First five minutes: Quiz 02.
- Two student presentations on the readings (and two student
extemporaneous responses).
- Discuss this week's
lecture and required readings.
- Your TA will set up peer review groups (with 3-6 students
in each peer review group) and post these on your discussion
section wiki in case you forget.
- After discussion section: Remember to post
to your personal WordPress blog.
Online
This week you'll explore
the Prelinger
Archives, which contains thousands fantastic vintage educational
and corporate promotional films, some of which deal with information
and communication technology. Many of these films are in
color with sound, and most are short (15 or 20 minutes).
- Search this archive
for telecommunications-related films (telephone, telegraph,
etc.) and find the most interesting vintage film for a 21st
century class on the "information society"
that you can.
- Please note: Within each discussion section, every student
needs to find a different film to post! This means you
need to see what's already been posted in your section to avoid
duplication! (Students who do this assignment earlier
might have an easier time of it.)
- Post a link to your film on your discussion
section wiki pages and make an argument about why this film
is useful to students of our modern information and communication
infrastructure — what can we learn from the film you
found? You will want to create a separate wiki
page for this so that others can easily comment on it.
- Watch at least one of your fellow students' suggested films
and post a comment with your reaction.
- Please finish this online activity by next week's lecture.
Readings
- James R. Beniger, "Introduction," in The control
revolution: Technological and economic origins of the information
society (1986).

- Ruth Schwartz Cowan, "Communications technologies and
social control," in A social history of American technology (1997).

Optional:
- Kevin Robins and Frank Webster, "The long history of
the information revolution," in Times of the technoculture:
From the information society to the virtual life (1999).

- Richard R. John, "Recasting the information infrastructure
for the industrial age," in Alfred Chandler jr. and James
Cortada, eds., A nation transformed by information (2000).

- Greg Downey, "Telegraph messenger boys: Crossing the
borders between history of technology and human geography," The
professional geographer 55:2 (2003).
(Yes,
this was written by your professor. Don't worry, you
can still be critical of it.)
- Ruth Schwartz Cowan, "Industrial society and technological
systems," in A social history of American technology (1997).

- Steven
Lubar, "Telegraph" and "Telephone" in Infoculture (1993).

- David
Nye, "Shaping communication networks: Telegraph,
telephone, computer," Social Research (1997).

- Kurt Vonnegut jr., Player piano (1952),
selections.

|
September
28 2009 |
|
WEEK
05 |
The postindustrial creative economy
Lecture
- Make sure your online activity from last week is finished
by today.
- Topic: Understanding deindustrialization

Discussion
- Before section meets this week: Complete
your peer reviews of your fellow students' paper #1 drafts,
posted as comments on
their pages of the discussion section wiki.
- First five minutes: Quiz 03.
- Two student presentations on the readings (and two student
extemporaneous responses).
- Discuss this week's lecture and required readings.
- After discussion section: Remember to post
to your personal WordPress blog.
Online
While radio and television ushered in our current system of free
broadcast content supported by ever-intensifying, interspersed
advertising, we might forget that radio and television themselves
were the subject of intense national advertising campaigns in
the years following their introductions. We'll explore some
vintage ads this week.
- The Duke
University Library hosts a very nice digital collection of radio and television print
advertising from the 1920s through the 1950s in its "Ad*Access" project. Spend
some time exploring this collection, and see if you can find
one radio or television advertisement which each promotes its
product in a way that feels unfamiliar today — in other
words, an ad which describes radio or television as performing
a certain social functions, or holding a certain place in culture,
or exemplifying a certain ideal, which seems unfamiliar or
outdated with respect to current meanings of radio or television.
- Post this advertisement to your discussion section wiki
(you can either upload the image itself or just use its weblink)
and explain why it struck you as unfamiliar. You will
want to create a separate wiki page for this so that others
can easily comment on it.
- Comment on at least one fellow student's chosen advertisement
as well.
- Please finish this online activity by next week's lecture.
Readings
- Daniel Bell, "Post-industrial society," in The
coming of post-industrial society (1973).

- Ronald R. Kline, "Cybernetics, management science, and
technology policy: The emergence of 'information technology'
as a keyword, 1948-1985," Technology and Culture (2006).

Optional:
- Esther Dyson, George Gilder, George Keyworth, and Alvin Toffler,
"Cyberspace and the American dream," The Information
Society 12 (1996).

- Robert Reich, "The three jobs of the future," in The
work of nations: Preparing ourselves for 21st century capitalism (1992).

- Benjamin Barber, "From soft goods to service," in Jihad
vs. McWorld (2001).

- Nick Dyer-Witheford, "Revolutions," in Cyber-Marx:
Cycles and circuits of struggle in high-technology capitalism (1999).

|
October
05 2009 |
|
WEEK
06 |
The global network society
Lecture
- Make sure your online activity from last week is finished by
today.
- Topic: Cities and the information society

- This week I will distribute a list of terms and essay questions
to study which will help you prepare for our midterm exam next
week. (I will probably distribute these on our course
news weblog.)
Discussion
- First five minutes: Quiz 04.
- Two student presentations on the readings (and two student
extemporaneous responses).
- Discuss this
week's lecture and required readings.
- Turn in a printed final version of paper #1.
- After discussion section: Remember to post
to your personal WordPress blog.
Online
This week your online activity will involve the selection of the
book that you are going to read and review.
- Think about some search terms or phrases which might quickly
and effectively lead you to interesting books on "the information
society." Will using the term "information" suffice? What
will using the search term "information society" leave out? Be
creative.
- Using an online bookstore like Amazon.com,
do a search for a book related to the information society that
you would like to read. (We are starting in an online book
store in order to make sure that the book is still in print.) Narrow
your choice down to three candidates. Which book has the
most pages? Which costs the most? Which is most recent? Which
has the best reviews?
- Once you have found three possible books, look each of them
up through the public web interface of WorldCat. This
is a meta-catalog of all US public and university library catalogs.
Which book is held by more libraries? What
are the subject classifications of each book? Do they differ? Do
they suggest further, more interesting search terms? (You
may want to go back to step #2 with these terms.)
- Look each book up on Google
Books. Which book seems
to have generated the most chatter on the Web? Which has
more reviews available
through Google? Are any of them in the public domain?
- Finally, look up each book on Library
Thing. (You may have to create a free account on
this service in order to search, but it's worth it.) Which
book has been read by more users of this social networking
service? Which
book seems to match best with other books that you think you
might like?
- Decide which book you want to read at this point.
- Now do a search
of your chosen book on two academic journal databases: ProQuest and Project
Muse. What journals have reviewed your
book? Who
are the reviewers? What books have the reviewers themselves
written? Read and then print out or otherwise save these
book reviews
(you will use them in your final paper).
- Add a page linked to your personal discussion wiki
page that
describes the
book you have chosen (and the process you took to choose it). Include
an image of the cover (from Amazon.com) and a citation to any
academic reviews you found.
- Comment on another student's chosen book. (Has anyone
chosen the same book as you? That's OK.)
- Please finish this online activity by next week's exam.
Readings
- Stephen Graham and Simon Marvin, "Introduction" in Telecommunications
and the city: Electronic spaces, urban places (1996).

- Felix Stalder, "Flows and places," in Manuel
Castells: The theory of the network society (2006).

Optional:
- Manuel Castells, "The space of flows," in The
rise of the network society (1996).

- Manuel Castells, "An introduction to the information age," City 2:7
(1997).

- Stephen Graham, "Introduction," in The cybercities
reader (2004).

- Paul Edwards et al., "Understanding infrastructure: Dynamics,
tensions, and design" (2007).

|
October
12 2009 |
|
WEEK
07 |
Midterm exam
Lecture
During the time scheduled for lecture,
our midterm exam will be held in the normal lecture hall.
Discussion section
All sections are cancelled this week.
Readings
No reading. Study for your exam. |
October
19 2009 |
|
WEEK
08 |
Cyberspace and hypermedia
Lecture
Discussion
- First five minutes: Quiz 05.
- Two student presentations on the readings (and two student
extemporaneous responses).
- Discuss this week's lecture and required readings.
- Discuss tasks and strategies for paper #2. (Rough draft
due on wiki by start of next week's discussion.)
- Graded paper #1 handed back.
- Graded midterm exam handed back.
- After discussion section: Remember to post
to your personal WordPress blog.
Online
This week you are going to explore some historical news databases.
- Pick a term relating to the modern information society —
"world wide web" or "computer" or "cell
phone" or "digital divide" or ... well, use your imagination. The
only constraint is that you can't pick a term that one
of your fellow sectionmates has used (so it is in your interest
to do this assignment early!)
- Try to find the earliest journalistic use of this term in
three different historical newspaper databases provided by
ProQuest: the New
York Times, the Chicago
Tribune, and the Los
Angeles Times.
- Now take the same term and try to find its earliest use in
three different scholarly article databases: ProQuest, Project
Muse, and JStor.
- Write a brief entry on your section wiki page about the ways
in which your term
was first used. You will want to create a separate wiki
page for this so that others can easily comment on it.
- Visit another student's section wiki page and comment on
what they found out about the term that they explored.
- Please finish this online activity by next week's lecture.
Readings
- Gordon Graham, "The radically new and the merely novel: How transformative
is the Internet?" in The
Internet: A philosophical inquiry (1999).

- Roy Rosenzweig, "Wizards, bureaucrats, warriors, and hackers: Writing
the history of the Internet," American Historical Review (1998).

Optional:
- Jennifer Light, "When computers were women," Technology
and Culture (1999).

- Nathan L. Ensmenger, "Making programming masculine" (2008).

- Steven Lubar, "Before computers," in Infoculture (1993).

- Lee Sproull, "Computers in US households since 1997" (2000).

- Greg Downey, “Jumping contexts of space and time,” IEEE
Annals of the History of Computing (April-June 2004).

- Paul N. Edwards, "Y2K: Millennial reflections on computers
as infrastructure," History and Technology 15
(1998).

- Cory Doctorow, "When sysadmins ruled the earth" (2006).

|
October
26 2009 |
|
WEEK
09 |
Searching and tagging
Lecture
- Make sure your online activity from last week is finished
by today.
- Topic: Beyond Google
 
Discussion
- Before section meets this week: Post
your rough draft of paper #2 to your personal wiki pages (you
will want to create a separate page so that your peer reviewers
can just "comment"
at the bottom).
- First five minutes: Quiz 06.
- Two student presentations on the readings (and two student
extemporaneous responses).
- Discuss this week's lecture and required readings.
- After discussion section: Remember to post
to your personal WordPress blog.
Online
This week we'll explore a famous article by scientist,
engineer, and wartime government administrator Vannevar Bush
on hyperlinked media that many cite as an inspiration for today's World Wide
Web.
- Read Bush's 1945 article entitled "As
we may think," where he describes his vision of
an information infrastructure he called the "Memex."
- Twenty years later, in 1967, Bush wrote a follow up article, "Memex
revisited," which recast his ideas in light of the
early computer revolution. Read this revised version
and think about the differences from the 1945 version.
- Do a Google search on "Memex" and explore a tiny fraction
of the millions of hits that appear. (You don't have
to explore all of them.)
- About thirty years after this, in 1995, a symposium was
held at MIT to consider Bush's Memex ideas fifty years
after their original publication. (Remember, this was only
a few years after the World Wide Web had appeared on the
media stage.) Many of the attendees were well-known
pioneers in the area of hypertext research, like Douglas
Englebart (inventor of the computer mouse), Ted Nelson
(author of the 1970s counterculture computer manifesto "Computer
Lib!")
and Tim Berners-Lee (creator of the protocols that underlie
the World Wide Web itself). Read this
description of their reactions to the original Vannevar
Bush article.
- Finally, go to your discussion section wiki and comment
on what you've found and what you think of the Memex idea
today. You will want to create a separate wiki
page for this so that others can easily comment on it.
- Reply to at least one other student's wiki posting.
- Please finish this online activity by next week's lecture.
Readings
- Alex Wright, "The web that wasn't," in Glut:
Mastering information through the ages (2007).

- Jonathan Zittrain, "The lessons of Wikipedia," in The
future of the Internet, and how to stop it (2008).
Optional:
- Greg Downey, “The librarian and the Univac: Automation
and labor at the 1962 Seattle World’s Fair,” in
C. McKercher and V. Mosco, eds., Knowledge workers in the
information society (Lexington Books, 2007).

- Vannevar Bush, "As we may think" Atlantic Monthly (1945)
and
Vannevar Bush, "Memex revisited" (1967). 
Please note that the Friday of the ninth
week of classes is generally the last date a student may drop
a course. |
November
02 2009 |
|
WEEK
10 |
Social networking
Lecture
- Make sure your online activity from last week is finished
by today.
- Film: Disconnected (2008)

Discussion
- Before section meets this week: Complete
your peer reviews of your fellow students' paper #2 drafts on
their pages of the discussion section wiki.
- First five minutes: Quiz 07.
- Two student presentations on the readings (and two student
extemporaneous responses).
- Discuss this week's lecture and required readings.
- Discuss paper #2 revision strategies.
- After discussion section: Remember to post
to your personal WordPress blog.
Online
This week's challenge will be especially difficult. Get
ready.
- Attempt to survive without using any personal social networking
tools for one week, Monday to Sunday. Do not consult
or post to Facebook. Do
not Tweet. Do not answer personal emails (or even read
them, if you can avoid it). The only thing you are allowed
to do is the minimum necessary online participation for other
classes you are taking.
- Once the week is up (or once you've thrown in the towel if
you don't make it to the end of the week), write about the
experience on your discussion section wiki. How
do you end up
communicating
with people? How
do you coordinate meetings with your friends? How
do you survive without taking a Quiz On Your Favorite Star
Wars Mini-Figure every hour? You will want to create
a separate wiki page for this so that others can easily comment
on it.
- Comment on at least one other student's write-up.
- Be thankful you weren't a college student before the early
1990s, like I was, when THERE WAS NO WORLD WIDE WEB! (Gasp!)
- Please finish this online activity by next week's lecture.
Readings
- Atsushi Akera, "Communities and specialized information businesses," in
William Aspray and Paul E. Ceruzzi, eds., The Internet and American business (2008).

- Ari Melber, "About Facebook," The Nation (07 January
2008).

Optional:
- Lawrence Lessig, "Cyberspaces," in Code and
other laws of cyberspace (1999).

- Andrew Chadwick, "The political economy of internet
media,"
in Internet politics (2006).

- Langdon Winner, "Who will we be in cyberspace?" The
Information Society (1996).

- Caroline Haythornthwaite and Barry Wellman, "The internet
in everyday life: An introduction" (2002).

- Growing up online (60 min). You may reach
this film on the PBS
web site
or
through Google
video .
|
November
09 2009 |
|
WEEK
11 |
Online work
Lecture
Discussion
- First five minutes: Quiz 08
- Two student presentations on the readings (and two student
extemporaneous responses).
- Discuss this week's lecture and required readings.
- Turn in printed final version of paper #2.
- After discussion section: Remember to post
to your personal WordPress blog.
Online
This week you will explore the presence of casualized labor on the Interent --
and in real communities.
- Manpower Inc. is the world's largest temporary employment firm: "Manpower's
worldwide network of 4,500 offices in 80 countries and territories
enables the company to meet the needs of its 400,000 clients
per year, including small and medium size enterprises in all
industry sectors, as well as the world's largest multinational
corporations." Explore
their web site a bit to get a sense of what this firm does. (They
even have a branch on Second Life ...)
- Now go to the US site for Manpower and do a job
search in three different areas: (1) Madison, WI; (2) your
hometown (or the city closest to your hometown); (2) a town
or city you might like to someday live in.
(Hint: Leave the "Keyword(s)" field on the search page
empty, but choose a specific state from the drop-down menu, click
on a specific town in the "locations"
list, and then click the ">" button to move that
town into the search box. Finally, click "Search.")
What kind of technology skills do these jobs demand? How
many temporary vs. permanent jobs are listed? Do these
look like good jobs to you?
- Write up a report of your findings, comparing the three places
you investigated, for your discussion section wiki. You
will want to create a separate wiki page for this so that others
can easily comment on it.
- Comment on at least one other student's posting.
- Please finish this online activity by next week's lecture.
Readings
Please note that we're swapping this week's readings with next
week's readings as they appear in your reader. The ones listed
below are the ones you should do for this week!
- Frank Levy and Richard J. Murnane, "How computers change
work and play," in The new division of labor: How computers
are creating the next job market (2004).

- Mark Deuze, "Creative industries, convergence culture,
and media work," Media Work (2007).

Optional:
- Karen Hossfeld, "'Their logic against them': Contradictions
in sex, race, and class in Silicon Valley" (1990), in A.
Nelson et al eds., Technicolor: Race, technology, and everyday
life (2001).

- Janet W. Salaff, "Where home is the office: The new form
of flexible work," in Barry Wellman and Caroline Haythornthwaite,
eds., The internet in everyday life (2002).

- Amitava Kumar, "Temporary access: The Indian H-1B worker
in the United States" (2001), in A. Nelson et al eds., Technicolor:
Race, technology, and everyday life (2001).

|
November
16 2009 |
|
WEEK
12 |
Games and avatars
Lecture
- Make sure your online activity from last week is finished
by today.
- Topic: Games as product, pastime, and social commentary

Discussion
- First five minutes: Quiz 09
- Two student presentations on the readings (and two student
extemporaneous responses).
- Discuss this week's lecture and required readings.
- Discuss your book slideshow or movie project. Your TA
will tell you where
to find Flip Video cameras and how to use them.
- Graded paper #2 handed back to students.
- After discussion section: Remember to post
to your personal WordPress blog.
Online
This week you'll explore the phenomenon of creating online characters representing
human identity through textual or graphical means, called "avatars."
- Read this short
selection from Neal Stephenson's early-1990s book Snow
Crash in which the main character, Hiro Protagonist
(get it?) visits an online world called the "Metaverse."
- Now visit the Second
Life web site and download the necessary software to
create an avatar of your own. Or if you're a member
of another online community or online game (like "World
of Warcraft") you may use an avatar from that system. (Or
you may want to simply create a rather cartoonish avatar
like the ones available on the Nintendo Wii system, which
you can do here.)
- Read through this photoessay
on people and their cyberspace avatars from the New York
Times and think about the different ways that people choose
to represent themselves online.
- Post a screen capture image of your Second Life, WoW, Wii,
or other avatar to your discussion section wiki. You
will want to create a separate wiki page for this so that others
can easily comment on it.
- In the same posting to the wiki, write a bit about the process
of creating this avatar. Did you try to represent yourself,
or split from your real life persona? Was it easy to
create an avatar, or did you feel limited by the range of options? How
are race and gender and ethnicity and other markers of "difference" present
or not present in your avatar?
- On the wiki, take a look at the other avatars your fellow
students have posted, and comment on at least one of them.
- Please finish this online activity by next week's lecture.
Readings
Please note that we're swapping this week's
readings with last week's readings as they appear in your reader.
The ones listed below are the ones you should do for this week!
- Peter Ludlow and Mark Wallace, "The Death of Urizenus," in The
Second Life Herald: The virtual tabloid that witnessed
the dawn of the metaverse (2007).

- Brad King and John Borland, "Gamers, interrupted," in Dungeons
and Dreamers: The rise of computer game culture from geek
to chic (2003).

Optional:
- Edward Castronova, "Daily life on a synthetic earth," in Synthetic
worlds: The business and culture of online games (2005).

|
November
23 2009 |
|
WEEK
13 |
Online
education
Lecture
- Make sure your online activity from last week is finished
by today.
- Topic: The university of the future?

Discussion
All discussion sections
cancelled for Thanksgiving.
Please cook your poultry to an appropriate temperature.
Online
Last week you explored the world of temporary digital employment.
As we saw with Deborah Brandt's article in your reader
a few weeks ago, employable expertise in literacy (and the technological
tools for applying literacy) varies with historical circumstance. This
week you'll explore some of those circumstances.
- While
you're on holiday for Thanksgiving, talk to a parent, aunt,
uncle, grandparent, neighbor, employer, teacher, or other significant
adult in your life, and ask them
to describe for you the most important information technology
they use (or once used) in their job. (This doesn't have
to be a digital information technology ... typewriters or stenography
machines count.) How did they first learn to use this
technology? How difficult was it to master? How
do they feel that this technology affected their working conditions — did
it make them more or less productive? Did it make them
enjoy their job more or less?
- Write up a report of your
conversation on your discussion section wiki, and analyze
what you heard with respect to this course and your own experiences. You
will want to create a separate wiki page for this so that others
can easily comment on it.
- Comment on at least one other student's posting.
- Please finish this online activity by next week's lecture.
Readings
- Kurt Squire, "Open-ended video games:
A model for developing learning for the interactive age," in
Katie Salen, ed., The ecology of games:
Connecting youth, games, and learning (2008).

- Robert Darnton, "Google and the future of books," New
York Review of Books (12 February 2009).

Optional:
- Tamar Lewin, "Universities rush to set up outposts abroad,"
New York Times (10 Feb 2008).

- James Gee, "Good video games, the human mind, and good learning,"
in Good video games + good learning (2007).

- Larry Cuban, "Cyberteaching in preschools and kindergartens," in Oversold
and underused: Computers in the classroom (2001).

|
November
30 2009 |
|
WEEK
14 |
Digital divides and differences
Lecture
- Make sure your online activity from last week is finished
by today.
- Topic: Producing and reproducing the digital divide

Discussion section
- Before section meets this week: Post an
outline of your slideshow or movie presentation to your personal
wiki page.
- First five minutes: Quiz 10
(last one!)
- Two student presentations on the readings (and two student
extemporaneous responses).
- Discuss this week's lecture and required readings.
Online
This week you will try to discern someone's real identity from
their online traces.
- Your TA will provide you with the address of the WordPress
weblog of another student in a different discussion section. Read
through the student's weblog and find out everything you possibly
can about the student.
- Make assumptions based on what the
student has written (and justify these assumptions).
- You
may try to track down the student's identity using other free,
public online tools as well (describe how you use these
tools). But beware, the student may be trying to trick
you.
- Build a profile of this student and describe
it on your discussion section wiki, along with a link to the
weblog you were reviewing.
- Email your TA when you have posted your profile, so your
TA can alert the student you were profiling -- they can check
your assumptions and findings and email you to tell you whether
or not you were correct.
- Wait for an email from your TA with a student who may have
been profiling you! Were they accurate?
- Please finish this online activity by next week's lecture.
Readings
- Lisa Nakamura, "Cybertyping and the work of race in
the age of digital reproduction," in Cybertypes: Race,
ethnicity, and identity on the Internet (2002).

- Jody M. Roy, "Brotherhood of blood: Aryan tribalism
and skinhead cybercrews," in Tyrone L. Adams and Stephen
A. Smith, eds., Electronic tribes: The virtual worlds of
geeks, gamers, shamans, and scammers (2008).

Optional:
- Greg Downey, "Constructing closed-captioning in the
public interest: From minority media accessibility to mainstream
educational technology," info 9:2/3 (2007).

- Michael Zenos and Kirsten Foot, "Not your father's internet:
The generation gap in online politics," in W. Lance Bennett,
ed., Civic life online: Learning how digital media can
engage youth (2008).

|
December
07 2009 |
|
WEEK
15 |
Network security and the state
Lecture
- Make sure your online activity from last week is finished
by today.
- Topic TBA

Discussion
Last discussion section!
- Before section meets this week, you need to post your four-minute
narrated slideshow or digital movie to the discussion section
wiki.
- First five minutes: Make-up quiz! (Only
if you missed one of the regularly-scheduled quizzes with an
excused absence.)
- Start
discussion with any make-up student presentations, if needed.
- We'll take the rest of the section to screen each other's
presentations and films, voting on which one is the best. The
slideshow and movie
with the top votes from each section will advance to the
LIS 201 Academy Awards, where an Elite Panel of Judges (the
professor and his two kids) will decide which are the best. The
top film and slideshow will be presented to the whole class
in lecture next week. Maybe some runners-up too, if
I'm in a good mood.
- Last fifteen minutes: Fill out course evaluations
(TA leaves room).
Online
Last online activity! This week, you will discover how
much information
you can find out about yourself online.
- First, do
a geodemographic marketing analysis on yourself, by searching
online for data about the place where you live which someone
might ascribe to you. Here are some sites to start
with:
- Next, do an individual profile analysis on yourself,
by searching for online data specifically about you:
- Can you think
of any other sites to search for which might provide either
individual or aggregate data to help flesh out your
"digital puppet"?
- When you are finished searching these sites, create an entry
on your discusion section wiki describing the person that
a geodemographic firm would see when they look for "you". What
do you think about this representation of your existence? You
will want to create a separate wiki page for this so that others
can easily comment on it.
- Comment on at least one other student's posting for this
assignment.
- Please finish this online activity by next week's lecture.
Readings
Last readings!
- Ad Hoc Committee on the Triple Revolution, "The Triple Revolution:
Cybernation, Weaponry, Human Rights" (1964).

- Robert Dreyfuss, "Iran's green wave," The Nation (01
July 2009).

Optional:
- Benjamin Barber, "The old economy and the birth of a
new McWorld," in Jihad vs. McWorld (2001).

- Cees Hamelink, "The decent society and cyberspace," in The
ethics of cyberspace (2000).

- James Deane, "The other information revolution: Media
and empowerment in developing countries," in Bruce Girard
and Seán Ó Siochrú, Communicating
in the information society (2003).

|
December
14 2009 |
|
WEEK
16 |
Assessing the information society
Lecture
Last lecture!
- Make sure your online activity from last week is finished
by today.
- Wrap-up and review for final exam.
- Screening of the top student slideshow and digital film (plus
maybe a runner-up or two).
- This week I will distribute a list of terms and essay questions
to study which will help you prepare for our final exam next
week. (I will probably distribute these on our course
news weblog.)
Discussion
All discussion sections are cancelled
this week.
- However, you still need to post your
final 1000-word book review to your discussion wiki page this
week.
Online
No online assignment this week. But you
may wish to use your discussion section wiki to hold a study
session for the final exam ...
Readings
No readings this week. Review what you've learned. |
Final exam week |
The final exam for this course will be held
on Wednesday, December 23, 2009, from
12:25pm-2:25pm. Room
TBA (but most likely the normal lecture hall).
The final exam will consist of five short answer questions worth
one point each ("identify and give the significance of")
and one essay question worth five points. Sample
terms and essay questions for you to study will be posted on the
course news weblog. You may comment on these postings to
share ideas with other students in a virtual review session. |
|