UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON • COLLEGE OF LETTERS & SCIENCE SCHOOL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION STUDIES
 

PROFESSOR GREG DOWNEY
The Information Society

LIS 201

More!

Fall 2009
2650 Humanities
Monday 2:30pm-3:45pm
(plus weekly discussion section and weekly online activity)

Today, in an environment of web-enhanced workplaces, schools, and shopping malls, we routinely speak of living in an "information society". But what does this term mean and where did it come from? How has information -- in oral, print, broadcast, and now digital/networked forms -- been tied to notions of democracy, capitalism, social justice, and "progress" in American history? And if we really are living in a "postindustrial," "global," and "informational" economy today, what does such a world mean for our understandings of our fragmented selves, our cultural affiliations, and our social responsibilities to each other? Through both lecture and discussion, both readings and films, and both offline and online experiences, this course will guide students in interrogating the information society. As a Comm-B course open to all majors, students will both experiment with new personal publishing tools like text weblogs and video podcasts, and hone more traditional skills of academic argument and presentation.


(blog icon)Hybrid organization

LIS 201 is a new and somewhat experimental "hybrid" course — even though it is meant for on-campus, full-time students, it contains some elements of online education usually used for "distance" or "asynchronous" learning. What this means in practice is that our four-credit course is divided into four bite-sized portions each week:

  • 1984A regular 75-minute lecture by the professor every Monday.  We don't take attendance in this lecture but anything said here is fair game for quizzes and tests, so you really should attend.  Take notes, and if you miss a day, get the notes from a friend.  The professor will post copies of lecture slides to the web site on the day after each lecture, but these slides only summarize and do not capture all of the content of a live lecture.  And if you bring your laptop to lecture, follow Twitter topic #uwlis201 to participate in a realtime conversation about lecture.
  • DiscussionA regular 75-minute discussion section each week with your TA during the time you registered for.  These sections are capped at 18 students each, so you will get to know your peers as you practice your public speaking and academic writing skills.  You will also discuss each week's lectures and readings in discussion section. See the course timetable for section times and locations. 
  • An online activity  to be completed each week (before the following week's live lecture).  Sometimes this will be a narrated set of slides that you download and view much like a live lecture (except that you can do it in your pajamas).  Sometimes this might be a movie which you watch online.  Other times this might be a sort of online scavenger hunt with detailed instructions to read, view, and explore various web resources. 
  • TeletypeAn online conversation involving writing and peer review.  Usually you will be discussing the week's readings on a discussion section wiki, but your TA may ask you to comment on news items, online resources, or other topics related to the class as well.  Our online discussions and peer reviews will be hosted on the PBWorks service.

Special note: In Fall 2009, a special graduate-student section of LIS 201 will be held from 9:30am-10:30am on Tuesdays.  It is listed as LIS 640, "Special topics in information studies."  Graduate students in this section are expected to attend Monday lecture together with undergraduates, and will have an extended schedule of readings but an abbreviated schedule of assignments.  (No speeches or peer-reviewed writing assignments; basically we subtract most of the "Comm-B" assignments.)


(blog icon)Electronic resources

As a hybrid course, LIS 201 utilizes many new media technologies.  We do this both to deliver the class in a way that alters the traditional space-time relations of education (allowing you to participate at a distance, or at odd hours, or asynchronously, or through written text) and to expose students to some of the many collaborative online tools in use today. 

We choose "outside" tools on purpose -- we want you to become familiar with systems "at large" in the world, not just at Madison. Sometimes these tools may not work as well as we would like; we should consider these moments of reflection, not frustration. 

Please note that most of these tools are publicly visible, so students (and instructors) should keep alert: practice a civil and respectful tone, and be aware when you might be revealing personally identifiable information.

  • UWThis class-wide web page, listing the assignments and schedule for the whole semester, constantly updated with new content and links as the weeks go by.  Produced using Adobe Dreamweaver and hosted at the UW-Madison School of Journalism & Mass Communication (just because that's where I keep all my class web sites, regardless of department). You will want to bookmark this web page in your browser, and use it as a regular reference!
  • BloggerA class-wide news blog (at lis201.blogspot.com) for the professor and TAs to post class-wide issues and news articles related to the topic of the class.  (Students may comment on anything we put here.)  Produced and hosted using Blogger.
  • My Web SpaceA class-wide file repository storing electronic versions of the required and optional readings, as well as downloadable files and video associated with each week's online lectures.  Produced and hosted using UW Madison MyWebSpace.
  • PBWikiTA-led discussion section wikis for students to use in peer review critiques of polished drafts and podcast speeches.  Produced and hosted using PBWorks.  (This one is not publicly visible, so only your classmates and the instructors will see your polished drafts and podcast speeches.) 
  • My Web SpacePersonal student file repositories which students can use to upload digital images and videos which they want to share with the rest of the class.  Produced and hosted using UW Madison MyWebSpace.
  • WordPressPersonal student blogs where each student will create an online persona which later someone will read and view to try to discern information about your true self.  Produced and hosted using WordPress.

Obviously, taking a class with all of these electronic tools means you will need to have regular access to a computer.   All of the UW dorms have their own computer labs, and you may also use the College Library computer lab

There are plenty of other software tools available on campus for producing and consuming online content.  Check out the DoIT software training for students web site for ideas.


[icon]Grading

 

 

SCALE

 

A

90 - 100

 

AB

85 - 89

 

B

75 - 84

 

BC

70 - 74

 

C

60 - 69

 

D

50 - 59

 

F

0 - 49

There are 100 points available in this course:

  • One four-minute prepared oral presentation summarizing an article from your reader, in discussion section - 5 points.
  • One two minute extemporaneous oral response to another student's prepared oral presentation on that week's reader article, in discussion section - 5 points.
  • One 500-word written critique of a different article from your reader, posted to your discussion section wiki - 5 points.
  • One four-minute video or narrated slideshow presentation presenting a key argument from an outside book that you read, posted to your discussion section wiki- 10 points.
  • A 1000-word written review of that book, posted to your discussion section wiki - 5 points.
  • Two 1000-word written papers, posted to your discussion section wiki - 10 points each (20 points total).
  • Several 250-word peer reviews of other students written papers, entered as comments on your discussion section wiki - 5 points each assignment (10 points total)
  • Ten quizzes on readings or lecture, in discussions section - 1 point each (10 points total).
  • A midterm exam based on readings and lecture, involving both short answer and essay questions - 10 points.
  • A final exam based on readings and lecture, involving both short answer and essay questions - 10 points
  • Overall participation in discussion section, both in-person and online - 10 points.

(blog icon)Discussion sections

LIS 201 relies on six instructors: the professor plus five paid graduate teaching assistants (TAs).  Each TA manages two discussion sections of up to 18 students a piece (the professor only manages one).  Both the professor and the TAs hold regular in-person office hours. 

Each of these discussion sections has its own wiki, where students can assemble and present the materials relating to their readings, papers, peer reviews, and movies.

We encourage students to communicate with us through email; however, please compose your email as if you were writing a short letter or office memo, and not as if you were text-messaging a friend.  You should plan on at most a 48-hour turn-around on emails (longer over weekends). 

WIKI

DAY/TIME

ROOM

TA

301

Tues.  11:00 - 12:15

Humanities 2231

Greg Downey
302

Thurs. 11:00 - 12:15

Vilas 4011

Jennifer Huck

303

Tues. 9:30 - 10:45

Humanities 2211

Katy Tomlinson Kavanagh

304

Tues. 11:00 - 12:15

Humanities 2241

Katy Tomlinson Kavanagh

305

Tues. 4:00 - 5:15

HC White 4275

Chris Bocast

306

Wed. 9:30 - 10:45

Humanities 2261

Emily Johnson

307

Thurs. 9:30 - 10:45

Humanities 2115

Jennifer Huck

308

Thurs. 11:00 - 12:15

Babcock 119

Darcy Gervasio

309

Wed. 4:00 - 5:15

HC White 4275

Chris Bocast

310

Thurs. 4:00 - 5:15

HC White 4275

Emily Johnson

311

Tues. 11:00 - 12:15

Humanities 2619

Darcy Gervasio

 


[icon]Texts to purchase

[icon]
ASM
StudentPrint

There is no textbook for this course. Instead, we will read key articles on the information society selected by the instructor.  We have produced a xeroxed (non-profit) "reader" for you to purchase from ASM Student Print containing most of these articles. The reader should cost about $35, which is half to one-third the cost of a standard textbook.   You can expect anywhere from 25-75 pages of reading (two articles) each week.

UW-Madison students may also download any of the required or optional readings as PDF files (you will need your standard UW NetID login and password to enter) by clicking on these icons: PDF  However, all students are expected to bring a paper copy of each week's readings to discussion section.

You will use the articles in this reader as the basis for your speech assignments, below.  Information from the articles will also appear on exams.

NB: These articles were not chosen to be “unbiased” texts or to be the final word on the information society. Rather, I have picked these articles with three goals in mind: they are readable and interesting while still scholarly; they are relevant to current events; and, often, they are polemical in that they argue for a particular interpretation of the world which you may choose to agree with or to disagree with.


(blog icon)Book to purchase

Besides two articles each week from your course reader, each student will choose and read a full-length book dealing with the information society.  Your book may be either fiction or non-fiction, but it needs to be a substantial and serious work.  You will choose your book as part of your online assignment during week 06 of the course. 

[icon]
University Bookstore

[icon]
Rainbow Books

[icon]
Amazon

Because several students may decide to choose the same book and local libraries may not have enough copies, you should plan on purchasing this book (which will likely cost about $15).  You may wish to order this book through a local independent bookstore (like the University Bookstore or Rainbow Books) or through an online bookseller (like Amazon).

You will use your book as the basis for your movie assignment and your third writing assignment, below.


(blog icon)Speech assignments

Practicing oral communication skills is an important part of a Comm-B course.  In LIS 201 you will perform two in-class presentations: one prepared four-minute speech, and one extemporaneous (unrehearsed) two-minute response to another student's speech.  Each of these will be based on your readings for that week. 

Your TA will assign you a number during your first discussion section; use this number to figure out which week you will be presenting your prepared speech.  You will be called on randomly for your extemporaneous speech.

Prepared speech

The prepared speech is a four-minute summary and critique of one of the articles your class is discussing from the course reader that week. 

You should devote the first part of your presentation (2 minutes) to identifying the main arguments of the reading, outlining the author's claims, reasons, and evidence. You do not have to go into great detail (since all students will have read the article) but you do have to provide an accurate summary.

The rest of your presentation (2 minutes) should deal with your reaction to the reading. You need to make your own claim and your reason for that claim, providing evidence to support it. Like a good paper, your talk needs a short introduction and a satisfying conclusion.

Do not read your presentation! You may speak from simple notes that keep you on track, but allow the words to emerge spontaneously and conversationally. A good strategy is to practice your presentation in front of a mirror, a voice recorder, or a friend.

While you are making your presentation, your TA will designate a fellow student to record you on a little digital video camera.  Later, your TA will post this video on the discussion section wiki page for the reading you reviewed.  You are required to view your performance and perform a self-critique: reply to your TA with one way that you could improve your delivery next time. 

You will also need to post a written outline of your presentation to the discussion section wiki page for the article you are presenting.

Extemporaneous speech

The extemporaneous speech is a two-minute reaction to another student's prepared speech.

Your reply should both summarize and acknowledge what the student said about the article (1 minute) and then critique what that student said, offering your own ideas (1 minute). 

Remember, though, that "critique" doesn't necessarily mean "criticize."  Explain whether you agree or disagree with the student's assessment of the article, and why.  Or you may suggest a different way of understanding or interpreting the article, contrasting it with what the first student said. 

This is not an easy assignment — you only have two minutes.  Try to be constructive, civil, and, above all, concise.

Evaluation criteria for speeches

All TAs use the same oral presentation grading sheet and grade your speeches according to both content and delivery.

Content

  • Do you accurately capture what the author (or previous speaker) was saying?
  • Is your own claim clear?
  • Is your evidence for your claim convincing?
  • Have you uploaded a written outline?

Delivery

  • Have you kept to the time specified?
  • Are you loud enough to be heard?
  • Does your inflection and emphasis help convey your meaning (as in normal conversation)?
  • Are you, like, avoiding the use of slang and, basically, all those crutch phrases like "like" and "basically"?
  • Do you seem to be enjoying yourself (even if you aren't)?

(blog icon)Writing assignments

You will write three 1000-word (four-page) papers for this class.  Even though these papers are short, they should still each have the three basic components of an academic essay:

  1. An introduction which clearly states a thesis (and please underline that thesis).
  2. A body which develops the thesis, with one argument per paragraph.
  3. A conclusion which not only restates the thesis, but leaves the reader with something more.

TypewriterFor the first two papers, you will write a polished draft and post it to your personal discussion section wiki page.  Then you will receive TA and peer feedback, and only after this feedback will you write a final draft.   For the third paper, you will not use the peer review process.

(1) Critiquing the information society

During the first part of this course, you were assigned several readings which discussed the promise and peril of a society tied to information and communication infrastructures in broad terms. 

For this paper, choose one specific information or communication technology (digital television, a weekly newspaper, the Play Station Portable, billboards on buses — be creative!) and use at least two scholarly articles to analyze that technology, making an argument about how that technology interacts with society and how it exemplifies or refutes the notion of an "control" or "postindustrial" or "network" society. 

In other words, your paper should answer the questions: What primary purpose does your information or communication technology serve?  Which concept of an information society — a control revolution, postindustrial economy, or network society — can you use to analyze this technology?  Does your technology  — and the way it is promoted, used, or even ignored by humans — support or refute this notion of an information society? 

Please note that this paper cannot rest simply on your opinions. Your arguments must be drawn from ideas presented in the articles you use, and your evidence should be specific to the media product you chose.  You may use articles from your reader, articles form the "optional readings" on this web site, or articles you find on your own.

(2) Connecting technology to social goals

In the second part of this course, through lecture and readings we are discussing the way online culture connects to various social processes: recreation and work, education and warfare. 

For this paper, pick any web site you like and use at least two scholarly articles to analyze that web site, including its purpose, its audience, its social function, and its relation to democratic, economic, educational, or cultural goals.

We are intentionally giving you more freedom and less guidance on this paper.  However, you may want to consider: What formerly offline social processes does your chosen web site attempt to adapt or encompass?   What are the greatest benefits and the greatest risks to society as such social activity moves online?

(3) Reviewing a book on the information society

For your last paper, you will write an analytical book review of the information society book you chose to read. 

An analytical book review is not simply a description of the author's writing style and whether or not you found the book interesting.  Instead, you must succinctly and accurately describe the main thesis of the book, and tell us whether the author has effectively used evidence and argument to convince you of that thesis.

For this paper, you should cite at least one outside scholarly review of your book (which you should have located when you first picked your book) and you should use at least one scholarly article to help you analyze your book.  (Again, you may choose from the articles in your reader, articles in the "optional readings" on this web site, or articles you find on your own.)

You do not post a rough draft of this paper to the wiki; you only post the final draft.

Guidelines for rough drafts

  • A rough draft is a complete draft; fragments or outlines will not be accepted.
  • Underline your thesis statement.
  • Clearly separate your paragraphs either through indentation or a blank line.
  • Include a short bullet-point outline with your draft.  (You may want to reverse-outline your paper.)
  • Properly cite your sources within the text of the paper.
  • Include a properly formatted list of references at the end.
  • Proofread your draft!
  • Post your rough draft to the discussion section wiki on your personal wiki page.  You may want to create a separate sub-page for each draft, so that your peer reviewers can easily comment on it.  Just copy the text from your word processor directly into this wiki page.

Guidelines for final papers

  • Underline your thesis statement.
  • Use one-inch margins on all sides
  • Double-space all text.
  • Indent all paragraphs; no extra blank lines between paragraphs.
  • Use 12-point Times, Times Roman, or Times New Roman font.
  • Number your pages.
  • Put your name and your TA's name on the first page.
  • Turn in a one-page outline with each draft.
  • Turn in a one-page list of references with each draft (APA style).
  • Staple all pages (no paperclips or corner folds).
  • Proofread your final paper!

Instantly boost your writing grade!

  • Proofread.
  • “Simplify, simplify, simplify!” Use clear, direct, and concise wording.
  • Do not be redundant. Do not say things twice in a different way just to add words.
  • Present your arguments in the paper in the same order that you lay them out in the thesis. (Your outline can help you here.)
  • Check out these "nine rules for good writing" and test yourself on these writing exercises.
  • Did we mention proofreading?

Never, never, never do!

  • When referring to a work of nonfiction, never use the word “novel” – this implies a work of fiction and will cause your TA to wince uncontrollably.
  • Never begin your conclusion with “In conclusion” or “To conclude” or “By way of concluding, ready or not, here I go” ...
  • Never use slang in your writing, daddy-o; that is meg bad.
  • Never try to entertain your reader with asides, puns, and witty comments (unless you are writing a course web site).

Citing outside sources

In each paper you are expected to use scholarly articles (from your reader, from the optional readings on this web site, or from your own literature search) to support your arguments. You need to cite these outside articles whenever you use an idea, quote, or fact from these sources. We recommend APA style when citing sources in LIS 201 papers:

  • In the text of the paper, use the author's last name, the year of publication, and the page number, like this: (Gitlin, 2002, p. 10)
  • In the list of references at the end, organize alphabetically by author last name, like this: Gitlin, T. (2002). Media unlimited: How the torrent of images and sounds overwhelms our lives. New York: Henry Holt and Co.
  • For all the details on APA style see this summary and sample paper documented in APA style.

If it is not your idea, cite it. Failure to properly cite outside sources is plagiarism and academic dishonesty and may be grounds for failing both the assignment and the course.

And please remember, wikipedia entries and random blog posts do not count as "scholarly articles" (though they may point you to more authoritative and useful resources).

Evaluation criteria for all papers

All TAs use the same written grading sheet covering the following criteria:

1. Following instructions.  Does your paper follow the instructions of the assignment? Was it turned in on time? Does it conform to our formatting guidelines?

2. Grammar and style.  Do you avoid grammatical, spelling, and usage errors? Do you have any run-on sentences or non-sentences? Are your sentences clear and concise? Are references in correct APA style?

3. Thesis and structure.  Does your introduction contain a clear thesis (underlined)? Does your conclusion end with a compelling idea? Do arguments and examples build logically in between, following your outline?

4. Use of sources.  Does your paper demonstrate that you understand the examples and arguments from the articles you use? Does your thesis deal with the central arguments rather than peripheral issues? 

5. Arguments and evidence.  Do you support your thesis with compelling evidence and arguments? Do you counter at least one possible argument against your answer?

6. Creativity and difficulty.  Finally, remember that we appreciate papers which find exemplary outside sources, represent an unusual challenge, take on a unique case, or come up with a creative point of view. 

Finding scholarly articles

icon
Memorial
Library

icon
College
Library

In order to find an authoritative outside source, you should use the resources available at our campus libraries. For example, you can search for academic journal research articles in the ProQuest Research Library or in UW-Madison QuickSearch for Articles.  Your TA may suggest other research techniques in class.  And the library hosts a series of online tutorials called "CLUE" which can introduce you to ways of finding books and journal articles here on campus.

Getting help from the Writing Center

Our campus is lucky to have a top-notch and easily-accessible Writing Center which is free for all students to use. The Writing Center is located on the 6th floor of Helen C. White Hall (the same building as the College Library). You should all feel free to get assistance from the Writing Center staff on any of your three papers. Visit them online too.


(blog icon)Peer reviews

Your TA will divide each section into groups of three to six students for peer reviews.  You will review the rough drafts of the other students in your peer review group, and they will each review your rough drafts.

Peer reviews are to be posted on the discussion section wiki on the same page the rough draft of each student you are reviewing.  Each review should include both things the author did well and things the author still needs to work on.  Which does the student need to work on more, writing style and grammar or argument and evidence? 

Each peer review should be at least 250 words.

These peer reviews will not be anonymous, so you should take care to offer constructive criticism (the same kind of criticism you would like to see someone offer on your paper).


(blog icon)Movie assignment

Besides completing a written review of your book, one of your assignments is to take an idea from this book and communicate it using either a four-minute narrated slideshow or a four-minute digital movie. 

Preparing and narrating a slideshow

There are many ways to use slideshow programs like Microsoft PowerPoint or Apple Keynote effectively.  There are even more ways to use them ineffectively.  If you choose to illustrate an idea from your book using a narrated slideshow, you will use a very scripted and effective format for that slideshow, called "Ignite."

In an Ignite presentation, you have a pre-set amount of time to work through a pre-set number of slides, each of which advances automatically.  So if you get four minutes for your presentation, you get 16 slides, which cross the screen at a rate of one every 15 seconds.  (A normal Ignite presentation is five minutes with 20 slides, but we're giving you a bit of a break.)

Usually in an Ignite presentation, people try to choose slides with interesting images or charts on them, and talk their way through explaining each one in turn.  This avoids the common slideshow pitfall of simply creating slides full of words and then reading the words out loud.

Most modern slide programs have a feature allowing you to record an audio narration to a slideshow.  You may need a friend's help to click the "next slide" button at the appropriate time (every fifteen seconds).  Don't worry if at the end you're a little under or over four minutes. 

Recording and editing a movie

Instead of a slideshow, you may choose to illustrate an idea from your book by making a complete four-minute digital movie.   You may very well have a computer, cell phone, or other gadget which can record digital video.  If you like, you may use this device as long as it records in any of the standard video formats (like "Quicktime" or "Windows Media") that can be easily played through most web browsers.

Flip VideoIf you do not have your own digital video recorder, you may check out a nice little easy-to-use Flip Video recorder from the SLIS Laboratory Library on the 4th floor of Helen C. White.  (We currently have sixteen of these; tell them you're an LIS 201 student.)  These cameras may be checked out, using your normal university ID, for three days at a time. They run on AA batteries which you will have to supply if they run out. (For more on how to use the Flip Video cameras, see their technical support page.)

Please be aware: If you check out one of these cameras, you are responsible for treating it with care and returning it in clean and usuable condition.  By entrusting the class with $200 digital video cameras, or with any other shared resource, I am fully expecting you to behave as responsible adults and treat this equipment (and its subsequent users) with respect, just as you would in a corporate internship or entry-level job. 

Movies can be a little complicated to shoot and edit, so if you would like to team up with a fellow student to complete this assignment, that's fine; however, no matter how much you help each other out in pairs or in groups, each student must turn in their own, unique movie based on the book they have read.

Uploading your slideshow or movie

After you have recorded either a movie or a slideshow, upload it to your discussion section wiki and place a link to it on your personal wiki page.  Then spend some time watching the movies of your classmates to decide which one you like the best!


[icon]Special needs

Persons with disabilities are to be fully included in thiscourse. Please let me know if you need any special accommodations to enable you to fully participate. I will try to maintain confidentiality of the information you share with me. To request academic accomodations, please register with the McBurney Disability Resource Center.


[icon]Academic honesty

Academic honesty requires that the course work a student presents to an instructor honestly and accurately indicates the student's own academic efforts. If you are unsure about what qualifies as academic dishonesty, please consult the Academic Misconduct Guide for Students.  Two points in particular to keep in mind:

  • copying or paraphrasing material from books, articles, or web pages without proper quotation and citation is plagiarism

  • copying or paraphrasing material from fellow students is plagiarism

Please remember that any plagiarism may be sufficient grounds for failing a student in the entire course.


US flagClassroom respect

Think.The UW-Madison is committed to creating a dynamic, diverse and welcoming learning environment for all students and has a non-discrimination policy that reflects this philosophy. To be disrespectful in behavior or comments addressed towards any group or individual, regardless of race/ethnicity, sexuality, gender, religion, ability, or any other difference is unacceptable in this class, and will be addressed publicly by the professor.


US flagLaptop policy

I believe that in the modern university, and especially in a class on the information society, laptops, PDAs, and other digital devices can be acceptable student tools for notetaking and realtime online research in the lecture hall. 

However, with ubiquitous, broadband, wireless Internet connections, laptops also pose a unique temptation to inattention and disrespect, providing the ability to check Facebook, shop for vintage Star Wars minifigures, or play Kingdom of Loathing while someone else is spending time and money to provide you with a quality educational experience.  And you need to realize that what seems like private web-browsing to you appears like an effective 32" television screen of distraction to the students sitting close beside and behind you. 

Because of this, I have several rules for laptops in lecture:

  1. The front few rows of the lecture hall will be laptop-free zones.  Students who wish to listen and take notes by hand should not have to stare at your glossy LED widescreen.
  2. If you wish to spend the whole lecture surfing the web, please skip class instead.  You wouldn't come to lecture and sit hidden behind a printed newspaper for 75 minutes, would you?  Show us the same respect with your laptop.
  3. If you have your laptop online during lecture, make use of that wifi connection for course purposes.  Fact-check what I'm saying and raise your hand if you find an alternative explanation or point of view.  Offer up additional information or questions.  Or follow the topic #uwlis201 on Twitter to engage in a realtime side-conversation on the lecture.
  4. Donate your extra laptop processor power to a useful research cause.  Download the free BOINC research software and mobilize your computer's in-between processor cycles to help scientists fold proteins, decode DNA sequences, or search the universe for ET.

US flagMilitary call-ups

We recognize that those students serving in the armed forces may be called to active duty at any time.  The university has posted guidelines for students who are called to duty detailing options for withdrawing from, dropping, or completing courses.  In general, students called to military service may receive credit for this class if leaving after the midway point of the course, at the discretion of the instructor, based on the student's earned grade up to the time of departure.


[icon]About the professor

Greg Downey <gdowney @ wisc.edu> is a professor with a 50 percent appointment in the School of Journalism and Mass Communication and a 50 percent appointment in the School of Library and Information Studies.  His teaching and research both center on the history and geography of information and communication technology and the often hidden human labor behind it.

Downey joined the UW faculty in 2001. He holds a B.S. and M.S. in computer science from the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana, an M.A. In liberal studies from Northwestern University, and a joint Ph.D. in history of technology and human geography from the Johns Hopkins University. Before coming to Madison, Downey spent a year as a postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Geography and the Humanities Institute at the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.

His industry experience as a computer analyst includes three years at the Leo Burnett advertising agency in Chicago, and three years at Roger Schank’s Institute for Learning Sciences at Northwestern University. He has held short-term volunteer positions with both the Center for Neighborhood Technology in Chicago and the Community Information Exchange in Washington D.C. And he used to draw a daily comic strip when he was an undergraduate, believe it or not.

coverBook coverDowney's first book, Telegraph Messenger Boys: Labor, Technology, and Geography, 1850-1950, was published by Routledge in 2002.  His second book, Closed captioning: Subtitling, stenography, and the digital convergence of text with television, was published by Johns Hopkins in 2008.  He is currently working on his third book, a history and geography of library labor and technology in the US over the 20th century.

Downey is currently the Director of the UW-Madison School of Journalism and Mass Communication.


[icon]Troubleshooting

We use a lot of technology in this class and sometimes it might not work as expected. Here are some tips (this list will probably grow over time, so check back):

  • If a video file won't play in your browser, remember you can download it to your hard drive (or to a USB drive) and try to play it outside of your browser, using free video playback software like QuickTime, Windows Media Player, or RealPlayer.  On the Mac, usually you CTRL-click to bring up a download menu; on Windows, it's usually a right-click on the mouse.
  • If a video file still won't play, you may have to install the "3ivx" QuickTime plugin.  You can download this here for both Windows and Mac computers.
  • To shrink the size of your video file before you upload it, note that the Flip software does have a "save for email" option that allows you to save the file as a smaller one in .wmv format. For example, a 57MB .avi video file (about 4.5 minutes) can be compressed to a 18MB .wmv file. It takes a long time though - about 18 minutes.  (And Mac users may need this free software to play .wmv files in QuickTime.)  Other video programs which may have come with your computer — such as Windows Movie Maker or iMovie — can probably be used to do the same thing.
  • When posting to UW MyWebSpace accounts, remember that there is a 1 GB file limit and a 400 MB per hour bandwidth limit (upload/download limit per hour). The image and video files that you will be uploading and downloading should fall below these limits, but if you run into problems, email your TA for assistance.
  • Remember that students are responsible for replacing batteries in the Flip Video cameras. 
  • If you encountera a technical glitch, first try to work through it yourself; but if that doesn't work, email your TA for assistance.

 

 

   

Quick Links

 

Blogger NewsBlogger News
PBWorks WikiPBWorks Wikis
     WordPress BlogWordPress Blogs

  Videolecture video

    Slideslecture slides

Textarticle text

   
   

News

 

Announcement: Spring course of interest for LIS 201 students

Computer Science 202
Introduction to Computation
Meets 1:20 – 2:10 Mon, Wed, Fri (3 Cr)
Instructor: Professor Andrea Arpaci-Dusseau

Would you like to understand how computers work? Do you want to know
how to use computation to solve problems?

Designed for a diverse audience, CS 202 focuses on understanding
algorithms, step-by-step methods for accomplishing a complex task.
Algorithms are useful in more places than you might imagine.
Algorithms specify the work that must be done for large, complex tasks
like sequencing the human genome. But, algorithms also describe how
people approach everyday problems like finding a path out of a maze or
solving a rubik's cube. Understanding how to solve problems in a
step-by-step fashion is useful for more than just computer scientists.
In this course, you'll investigate the types of problems we currently
know how to solve with computation and you'll compare different
algorithms that solve the same problem to determine which are the most
efficient.

In this course, you’ll also learn how modern computers perform
computation. For example, you’ll understand how hardware and software
store data, run applications, and display and find web pages. You’ll
learn about a wide range of areas in computer science, such as
robotics, human-computer interaction, and artificial intelligence.

To obtain hands-on experience with algorithms, we will be using a new
programming environment called Scratch. Scratch enables beginners to
create sophisticated programs by simply dragging and dropping
predefined instruction blocks. Thus, you will acquire experience
decomposing problems into well-defined steps without the fear of
frustrating ``syntax'' errors. You will use Scratch to create
animated stories, art, and educational games!

All majors are welcome!

For more information, please see:
http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~dusseau/Classes/CS202/

Previous news ...
  • Extra credit opportunity #2
  • Extra credit opportunity
  • Essay questions for the midterm
  • Short answer terms for the midterm
  • A new kind of anti-information-society space
  •    
       

    Calendar

     
    MONAugust 31 2009
     
    WEEK 01

    Preparing to study the information society

    Lecture
    Since our lectures are held on Mondays but classes don't start until Wednesday September 02, there will be NO live lecture this week.

    • Instead, please watch this short introductory video from Professor Downey. PDF (5 minutes) PDF
    • You may want to learn more about me at my personal web site. (Or you may not care.)
    • Make sure to read through this whole LIS 201 course web site (bookmark it in your web browser) so you know what to expect from this very unusual and very labor-intensive course! 
    • Please acquire the xeroxed course reader from ASM Student Print.

    Discussion
    Since many discussions sections are held on Tuesdays but classes don't start until Wednesday September 02, there will be NO discussion sections this week.

    • Instead, your TA will email you to introduce him/herself sometime this week. 
    • Rather than participating in a discussion this week, please take this short web survey on how much technology you've used in the classroom. PDF

    Online
    This week you'll learn how to use our wiki service, PBWorks, to access and post to your discussion section wiki.

    1. After your TA emails an introduction to you, you'll receive an emailed invitation to your discussion section wiki.  Just follow the directions to become a member of the wiki. 
    2. Notice that when you first go to your wiki home page (called the "front page"), the tab at the top indicates that you are in "VIEW" mode. 



      In a moment, we will EDIT this front page.
    3. On the front page of your discussion section wiki, your TA has created a big table listing all of the students in your section. You will create a wiki page for yourself and link it to your name in this table.
    4. At the top of the wiki front page, click the "EDIT" tab.  This brings the wiki into Editing mode. 



      Notice that there is now a familiar-looking toolbar of editing tools at the top of the page. 




      Be careful; you are live-editing the front page of your section wiki.  (If you mess something up, just hit "Cancel" at the bottom of the wiki page and try again.)
    5. Highlight your name and click the little "make a link" icon in the toolbar:  
    6. This brings up a window where you can specify what you want that text to link to. 



      For "Link type," choose "PBWorks Page" (the default).  For "Page," choose "--New Page--" (the default).  Finally, for "Page Name," notice that PBWorks has defaulted to the text you selected (your name) as the name of the new page.  Add the words "personal wiki page" to the end of this and then click "OK".
    7. The text you selected has now been changed in color to look like a normal web link.  Go ahead and hit "Save" at the bottom of the wiki page



      to save your edits.
    8. Now, in "VIEW" mode once again, find your name with the link you just created and click on it to try to go to the wiki page that has been created for you.
    9. Aha!  The wiki has figured out that you "linked" to a page that does not exist yet, so it's asking you to create this page first.  Go ahead and click the "Create page" button to do this.



      Now you have a blank wiki page all your own.
    10. Click "EDIT" at the top of your wiki page to add some text and introduce yourself.  Maybe describe where you're from and what your favorite Star Wars(tm) Collectible Action Figure is.  (Or not.)  Anyway, write at least 250 words.  After you're done, click "Save" at the bottom to see your changes added to the wiki page. 
    11. Now try to upload a digital photo of yourself to the wiki.  On the upper-right-hand-side of the wiki page, find the link to "Upload files" and click on it. 


      This takes you to a page listing all the extra word processing, image, sound, and video files that have been uploaded to this wiki.
    12. On this page, click the "Upload files" button



      and you will be presented with a file browser dialog box where you can pick a file from your computer to upload.  Find a nice digital photo of yourself (not too large, please) and upload it.
    13. Now that your image is uploaded to the wiki, navigate back to your personal wiki page and "EDIT".  On the right-hand side of the wiki page you'll see a tab for "Images and files." 



      Click this and you should see the image you just uploaded in the list.
    14. Click on the title of your image and it will be inserted into your wiki page.  Click "Save" at the bottom of your wiki page when you are satisfied with how the image looks.
    15. Finally, visit the personal wiki page of another student in your section and post a friendly "comment" to the bottom of their page. 
    16. If you run into trouble signing on to the wiki, creating your personal page, editing and saving text, or uploading an image, ask a classmate to help you or talk to your TA.

    Readings
    This week's readings cover tools you will use all semester long to improve your writing and speaking skills.

    1. Wayne C. Booth, Gregory G. Colomb, and Joseph M. Williams, The craft of research, 2nd ed. (2003), selections. PDF
    2. Laurie Rozakis, The complete idiot's guide to public speaking (1999), selections. PDF

    Optional:

    • Wayne C. Booth, Gregory G. Colomb, and Joseph M. Williams, "Planning and drafting [ch. 12]," "Revising your organization and argument [ch. 13]," "Introductions and conclusions [ch. 14]," and "Revising style [ch. 16]" The craft
      of research
      , 2nd ed. (2003). PDF
    • Anne Lamott, "Shitty first drafts" (1994). PDF
    • Brandon Royal, The little red writing book (2004), selections. PDF
    • Stephen E. Lucas, The art of public speaking, 6th ed. (1998),
      selections. PDF
    MONSeptember 07 2009
     
    WEEK 02

    Technology and social change

    Lecture
    Since our lectures are held on Mondays but classes are cancelled for Labor Day, there will be no live lecture this week either!  (Isn't this the strangest class you've ever had?)

    • Instead, please watch this prerecorded lecture by Professor Downey.  Topic: Thinking about technology and information. PDF (40 minutes) PDF

    Discussion
    Finally, discussion sections meet this week.

    • Meet your TA and your fellow students in person!  (Your TA may have you create a "table tent" to help everybody learn names.) 
    • Discuss the syllabus and grading.
    • Your TA will assign you to specific weeks and readings for your prepared oral presentations and your written article reviews.  (You won't know when you'll be called upon to do your extemporaneous oral presentations.) These will all be listed on your section wiki.
    • Discuss techniques for effective oral presentations.
    • Discuss this week's lecture and required readings. 

    Online
    This week you will prepare a personal weblog using the WordPress weblog service.

    1. This is a blog that you will be using as your own public space all through the semester. Near the end of the term, another student will be assigned to read your blog and try to figure out something about you based on your blog identity.  You may try to keep it real or fake them out -- your choice.
    2. Visit www.wordpress.com and click "Sign up now" to create your own weblog. (You will need to supply a login ID and email address to do this.)  You may want to use your real name as your ID, or you may want to use a pseudonym so that your real name is not made visible to the world.  Your choice.
    3. You may want to use your real name in your blog address (where you fill in _____.wordpress.com) and/or title, or you may want to use a pseudonym. Again, your choice.
    4. Post something good to your new blog to get things rolling! 
    5. Your assignment from now to the end of the semester is to post something, anything, at least once a week on this blog.  (But you may write more if you are inspired.)
    6. If you run into trouble signing on to the weblog, posting and commenting, or uploading and linking an image, either ask a classmate to help you or email your TA.

    Readings
    You need to have these readings completed by the time you get to discussion section each week, in order to be able to discuss them with your TA and fellow students.  We may quiz you on this readings as well.

    1. Donald MacKenzie and Judy Wajcman, "Introductory essay," in The social shaping of technology, 2nd ed. (1999). PDF
    2. Paul Edwards, "Infrastructure and modernity: Force, time, and social organization in the history of sociotechnical systems," in Thomas J. Misa et al. eds., Modernity and technology (2003).PDF

    Optional:

    • Merritt Roe Smith, "Technological determinism in American culture,"
      in Merritt Roe Smith and Leo Marx, eds., Does technology drive
      history? The dilemma of technological determinism
      (1994). PDF
    • Andrew Chadwick, "Some conceptual tools," in Internet politics: States, citizens, and new communication technologies (2006). PDF
    • Stephen Lubar, "Introduction," in Infoculture: The Smithsonian book of information age inventions (1993). PDF
    • David E. Nye, "Critics of technology," in Carroll Pursell, ed., A
      companion to American technology
      (2005). PDF
    • Langdon Winner, "Do artifacts have politics?" (1986) in Donald MacKenzie and Judy Wajcman, eds., The social shaping of technology, 2nd ed. (1999). PDF
    • Alfred D. Chandler jr., "The information age in historical perspective," in Alfred D. Chandler jr. and James W. Cortada, eds., A nation transformed by information: How information has shaped the United States from colonial times to the present (2000). PDF
    • Susan J. Douglas, "The turn within: The irony of technology in a globalized world," American Quarterly (2006). PDF

    Please note that the Wednesday of the second week of class is generally the last day to drop without a "DR" on your transcript. (You can still drop through the ninth week of class but there will be a notation on the transcript.)

    MONSeptember 14 2009
     
    WEEK 03

    Print culture and literacy

    Lecture
    Finally, lecture meets this week! Students are expected to attend all in-person lectures and take notes. Within 24 hours of each in-person lecture, I'll link a PDF version of any slides I showed in lecture next to the lecture title (click on the little PDF icon).

    • Topic: Three information societies PDF

    Discussion

    • First five minutes: Quiz  01 on the readings or the lecture!
    • Two student presentations, one on each of the readings (and two student extemporaneous responses).  Your TA will designate a classmate to record your presentations on digital video.  The recording will be uploaded to the discussion section wiki on the page for the article you discussed; after watching the recording, you must respond to your TA with one substantive way in which you could improve your delivery.
    • Discuss this week's lecture and required readings.   
    • Discuss tasks and strategies for paper #1.  (Rough draft due on wiki by start of next week's discussion.)
    • After discussion section: Remember to post to your personal WordPress blog.

    Online
    Starting with this week, each week you will have an online research and exploration exercise.  Each of these "scavenger hunts" will require you to write something about your experience at the end on your discussion section wiki.   Each one should take between 45-90 minutes to complete.

    This week's online lecture begins with an exhibit at the Smithsonian National Postal Museum on a World War II technological information system known as "V-Mail." 

    1. Visit the main V-mail web site and read through the introductory material.  Spend some time exploring this site, taking notes both on the social purposes of V-mail and the information/communication technologies needed to make V-mail work. 
    2. Make sure to try the "V-Mail service in action" interactive portion and view the V-Mail newsreel from 1944.   Would you argue that V-mail was a success? 
    3. Now spend some time searching for the ways that soldiers communicate with the homefront today.  See if you can track down a "milblog" (military weblog) written by a soldier about his or her experiences in Iraq, Afghanistan, or elsewhere around the globe. 
    4. For another written view on the war in Iraq, check out the last few entries from the "Baghdad Burning" weblog where an Iraqi woman wrote about her experiences during the war for several years.
    5. Go to your discussion section wiki and post something about what you've found.  You may want to create a separate wiki page for this so that others can easily comment on it. 
    6. Reply to a fellow student's post on this online lecture activity as well.
    7. Please finish this online activity by next week's lecture.

    Readings
    Have these read by the time you get to section this week!

    1. Deborah Brandt, "Accumulating literacy: How four generations of one American family learned to write," in Literacy in American lives (2001). PDF
    2. JoAnne Yates, "Communication technology and the growth of internal communication," in Control through communication: The rise of system in American management (1989). PDF

    Optional:

    • Richard D. Brown, "Early American origins of the information age" (2000). PDF
    • David Levy, "A bit of digital history," in Scrolling forward: Making sense of documents in the digital age (2001). PDF
    • Walter Ong, "Orality, literacy, and modern media" (1982). PDF
    • John B. Thompson, "The digital revolution and the publishing world," in Books in the digital age: The transformation of academic and higher education publishing in Britain and the United States (2005). PDF
    MONSeptember 21 2009
     
    WEEK 04

    The electromechanical control revolution

    Lecture

    • Make sure your online activity from last week is finished by today.
    • Topic: The control revolution and "modernity"PDF

    Discussion

    • Before section meets this week:  Post your rough draft of paper #1 to your personal wiki pages (create a separate subpage so that your peer reviewers can just "comment" at the bottom).
    • First five minutes: Quiz 02.
    • Two student presentations on the readings (and two student extemporaneous responses).
    • Discuss this week's lecture and required readings. 
    • Your TA will set up peer review groups (with 3-6 students in each peer review group) and post these on your discussion section wiki in case you forget. 
    • After discussion section: Remember to post to your personal WordPress blog.

    Online
    This week you'll explore the Prelinger Archives, which contains thousands fantastic vintage educational and corporate promotional films, some of which deal with information and communication technology.  Many of these films are in color with sound, and most are short (15 or 20 minutes). 

    1. Search this archive for telecommunications-related films (telephone, telegraph, etc.) and find the most interesting vintage film for a 21st century class on the "information society" that you can. 
    2. Please note: Within each discussion section, every student needs to find a different film to post!  This means you need to see what's already been posted in your section to avoid duplication!  (Students who do this assignment earlier might have an easier time of it.)
    3. Post a link to your film on your discussion section wiki pages and make an argument about why this film is useful to students of our modern information and communication infrastructure — what can we learn from the film you found?  You will want to create a separate wiki page for this so that others can easily comment on it. 
    4. Watch at least one of your fellow students' suggested films and post a comment with your reaction. 
    5. Please finish this online activity by next week's lecture.

    Readings

    1. James R. Beniger, "Introduction," in The control revolution: Technological and economic origins of the information society (1986). PDF
    2. Ruth Schwartz Cowan, "Communications technologies and social control," in A social history of American technology (1997). PDF

    Optional:

    • Kevin Robins and Frank Webster, "The long history of the information revolution," in Times of the technoculture: From the information society to the virtual life (1999). PDF
    • Richard R. John, "Recasting the information infrastructure for the industrial age," in Alfred Chandler jr. and James Cortada, eds., A nation transformed by information (2000). PDF
    • Greg Downey, "Telegraph messenger boys: Crossing the borders between history of technology and human geography," The professional geographer 55:2 (2003). PDF (Yes, this was written by your professor.  Don't worry, you can still be critical of it.)
    • Ruth Schwartz Cowan, "Industrial society and technological systems," in A social history of American technology (1997). PDF
    • Steven Lubar, "Telegraph" and "Telephone" in Infoculture (1993). PDF
    • David Nye, "Shaping communication networks: Telegraph, telephone, computer," Social Research (1997). PDF
    • Kurt Vonnegut jr., Player piano (1952), selections. PDF
    MONSeptember 28 2009
     
    WEEK 05

    The postindustrial creative economy

    Lecture

    • Make sure your online activity from last week is finished by today.
    • Topic: Understanding deindustrialization PDF

    Discussion

    • Before section meets this week: Complete your peer reviews of your fellow students' paper #1 drafts, posted as comments on their pages of the discussion section wiki.
    • First five minutes: Quiz 03.
    • Two student presentations on the readings (and two student extemporaneous responses).
    • Discuss this week's lecture and required readings. 
    • After discussion section: Remember to post to your personal WordPress blog.

    Online
    While radio and television ushered in our current system of free broadcast content supported by ever-intensifying, interspersed advertising, we might forget that radio and television themselves were the subject of intense national advertising campaigns in the years following their introductions.  We'll explore some vintage ads this week.

    1. The Duke University Library hosts a very nice digital collection of radio and television print advertising from the 1920s through the 1950s in its "Ad*Access" project.  Spend some time exploring this collection, and see if you can find one radio or television advertisement which each promotes its product in a way that feels unfamiliar today — in other words, an ad which describes radio or television as performing a certain social functions, or holding a certain place in culture, or exemplifying a certain ideal, which seems unfamiliar or outdated with respect to current meanings of radio or television.
    2. Post this advertisement to your discussion section wiki (you can either upload the image itself or just use its weblink) and explain why it struck you as unfamiliar.  You will want to create a separate wiki page for this so that others can easily comment on it. 
    3. Comment on at least one fellow student's chosen advertisement as well.
    4. Please finish this online activity by next week's lecture.

    Readings

    1. Daniel Bell, "Post-industrial society," in The coming of post-industrial society (1973). PDF
    2. Ronald R. Kline, "Cybernetics, management science, and technology policy: The emergence of 'information technology' as a keyword, 1948-1985," Technology and Culture (2006). PDF

    Optional:

    • Esther Dyson, George Gilder, George Keyworth, and Alvin Toffler, "Cyberspace and the American dream," The Information Society 12 (1996). PDF
    • Robert Reich, "The three jobs of the future," in The work of nations: Preparing ourselves for 21st century capitalism (1992). PDF
    • Benjamin Barber, "From soft goods to service," in Jihad vs. McWorld (2001). PDF
    • Nick Dyer-Witheford, "Revolutions," in Cyber-Marx: Cycles and circuits of struggle in high-technology capitalism (1999). PDF
    MONOctober 05 2009
     
    WEEK 06

    The global network society

    Lecture

    • Make sure your online activity from last week is finished by today.
    • Topic: Cities and the information society PDF
    • This week I will distribute a list of terms and essay questions to study which will help you prepare for our midterm exam next week.  (I will probably distribute these on our course news weblog.)

    Discussion

    • First five minutes: Quiz 04.
    • Two student presentations on the readings (and two student extemporaneous responses).
    • Discuss this week's lecture and required readings. 
    • Turn in a printed final version of paper #1.
    • After discussion section: Remember to post to your personal WordPress blog.

    Online
    This week your online activity will involve the selection of the book that you are going to read and review.

    1. Think about some search terms or phrases which might quickly and effectively lead you to interesting books on "the information society." Will using the term "information" suffice?  What will using the search term "information society" leave out?  Be creative.
    2. Using an online bookstore like Amazon.com, do a search for a book related to the information society that you would like to read.  (We are starting in an online book store in order to make sure that the book is still in print.)  Narrow your choice down to three candidates.  Which book has the most pages?  Which costs the most?  Which is most recent?  Which has the best reviews?
    3. Once you have found three possible books, look each of them up through the public web interface of WorldCat.  This is a meta-catalog of all US public and university library catalogs.   Which book is held by more libraries?  What are the subject classifications of each book? Do they differ?  Do they suggest further, more interesting search terms?  (You may want to go back to step #2 with these terms.)
    4. Look each book up on Google Books.  Which book seems to have generated the most chatter on the Web?  Which has more reviews available through Google?  Are any of them in the public domain?
    5. Finally, look up each book on Library Thing.  (You may have to create a free account on this service in order to search, but it's worth it.)  Which book has been read by more users of this social networking service?  Which book seems to match best with other books that you think you might like?
    6. Decide which book you want to read at this point.
    7. Now do a search of your chosen book on two academic journal databases: ProQuest and Project Muse.  What journals have reviewed your book?  Who are the reviewers?  What books have the reviewers themselves written?  Read and then print out or otherwise save these book reviews (you will use them in your final paper).
    8. Add a page linked to your personal discussion wiki page that describes the book you have chosen (and the process you took to choose it).  Include an image of the cover (from Amazon.com) and a citation to any academic reviews you found.
    9. Comment on another student's chosen book.  (Has anyone chosen the same book as you?  That's OK.)
    10. Please finish this online activity by next week's exam.

    Readings

    1. Stephen Graham and Simon Marvin, "Introduction" in Telecommunications and the city: Electronic spaces, urban places (1996). PDF
    2. Felix Stalder, "Flows and places," in Manuel Castells: The theory of the network society (2006). PDF

    Optional:

    • Manuel Castells, "The space of flows," in The rise of the network society (1996). PDF
    • Manuel Castells, "An introduction to the information age," City 2:7 (1997). PDF
    • Stephen Graham, "Introduction," in The cybercities reader (2004). PDF
    • Paul Edwards et al., "Understanding infrastructure: Dynamics, tensions, and design" (2007). PDF
    MONOctober 12 2009
     
    WEEK 07

    Midterm exam

    Lecture
    During the time scheduled for lecture, our midterm exam will be held in the normal lecture hall.

    Discussion section
    All sections are cancelled this week.

    Readings
    No reading.  Study for your exam.

    MONOctober 19 2009
     
    WEEK 08

    Cyberspace and hypermedia

    Lecture

    Discussion

    • First five minutes: Quiz 05.
    • Two student presentations on the readings (and two student extemporaneous responses).
    • Discuss this week's lecture and required readings. 
    • Discuss tasks and strategies for paper #2.  (Rough draft due on wiki by start of next week's discussion.)
    • Graded paper #1 handed back. 
    • Graded midterm exam handed back.
    • After discussion section: Remember to post to your personal WordPress blog.

    Online
    This week you are going to explore some historical news databases.

    1. Pick a term relating to the modern information society — "world wide web" or "computer" or "cell phone" or "digital divide" or ... well, use your imagination.  The only constraint is that you can't pick a term that one of your fellow sectionmates has used (so it is in your interest to do this assignment early!)
    2. Try to find the earliest journalistic use of this term in three different historical newspaper databases provided by ProQuest: the New York Times, the Chicago Tribune, and the Los Angeles Times
    3. Now take the same term and try to find its earliest use in three different scholarly article databases: ProQuest, Project Muse, and JStor
    4. Write a brief entry on your section wiki page about the ways in which your term was first used.  You will want to create a separate wiki page for this so that others can easily comment on it. 
    5. Visit another student's section wiki page and comment on what they found out about the term that they explored.
    6. Please finish this online activity by next week's lecture.

     

    Readings

    1. Gordon Graham, "The radically new and the merely novel: How transformative is the Internet?" in The Internet: A philosophical inquiry (1999). PDF
    2. Roy Rosenzweig, "Wizards, bureaucrats, warriors, and hackers: Writing the history of the Internet," American Historical Review (1998). PDF

    Optional:

    • Jennifer Light, "When computers were women," Technology and Culture (1999). PDF
    • Nathan L. Ensmenger, "Making programming masculine" (2008). PDF
    • Steven Lubar, "Before computers," in Infoculture (1993). PDF
    • Lee Sproull, "Computers in US households since 1997" (2000). PDF
    • Greg Downey, “Jumping contexts of space and time,” IEEE Annals of the History of Computing (April-June 2004). PDF
    • Paul N. Edwards, "Y2K: Millennial reflections on computers as infrastructure," History and Technology 15 (1998). PDF
    • Cory Doctorow, "When sysadmins ruled the earth" (2006). PDF
    MONOctober 26 2009
     
    WEEK 09

    Searching and tagging

    Lecture

    • Make sure your online activity from last week is finished by today.
    • Topic: Beyond Google SlidesVideo

    Discussion

    • Before section meets this week:  Post your rough draft of paper #2 to your personal wiki pages (you will want to create a separate page so that your peer reviewers can just "comment" at the bottom).
    • First five minutes: Quiz 06.
    • Two student presentations on the readings (and two student extemporaneous responses).
    • Discuss this week's lecture and required readings. 
    • After discussion section: Remember to post to your personal WordPress blog.

    Online

    This week we'll explore a famous article by scientist, engineer, and wartime government administrator Vannevar Bush on hyperlinked media that many cite as an inspiration for today's World Wide Web.

    1. Read Bush's 1945 article entitled "As we may think," where he describes his vision of an information infrastructure he called the "Memex." 
    2. Twenty years later, in 1967, Bush wrote a follow up article, "Memex revisited," which recast his ideas in light of the early computer revolution.  Read this revised version and think about the differences from the 1945 version.
    3. Do a Google search on "Memex" and explore a tiny fraction of the millions of hits that appear.  (You don't have to explore all of them.)
    4. About thirty years after this, in 1995, a symposium was held at MIT to consider Bush's Memex ideas fifty years after their original publication. (Remember, this was only a few years after the World Wide Web had appeared on the media stage.)  Many of the attendees were well-known pioneers in the area of hypertext research, like Douglas Englebart (inventor of the computer mouse), Ted Nelson (author of the 1970s counterculture computer manifesto "Computer Lib!") and Tim Berners-Lee (creator of the protocols that underlie the World Wide Web itself).  Read this description of their reactions to the original Vannevar Bush article
    5. Finally, go to your discussion section wiki and comment on what you've found and what you think of the Memex idea today.   You will want to create a separate wiki page for this so that others can easily comment on it. 
    6. Reply to at least one other student's wiki posting.
    7. Please finish this online activity by next week's lecture.

    Readings

    1. Alex Wright, "The web that wasn't," in Glut: Mastering information through the ages (2007). PDF
    2. Jonathan Zittrain, "The lessons of Wikipedia," in The future of the Internet, and how to stop it (2008).

    Optional:

    • Greg Downey, “The librarian and the Univac: Automation and labor at the 1962 Seattle World’s Fair,” in C. McKercher and V. Mosco, eds., Knowledge workers in the information society (Lexington Books, 2007). PDF
    • Vannevar Bush, "As we may think" Atlantic Monthly (1945) PDFand Vannevar Bush, "Memex revisited" (1967). PDF

    Please note that the Friday of the ninth week of classes is generally the last date a student may drop a course.

    MONNovember 02 2009
     
    WEEK 10

    Social networking

    Lecture

    • Make sure your online activity from last week is finished by today.
    • Film: Disconnected (2008) PDF

    Discussion

    • Before section meets this week: Complete your peer reviews of your fellow students' paper #2 drafts on their pages of the discussion section wiki.
    • First five minutes: Quiz 07.
    • Two student presentations on the readings (and two student extemporaneous responses).
    • Discuss this week's lecture and required readings. 
    • Discuss paper #2 revision strategies.
    • After discussion section: Remember to post to your personal WordPress blog.

    Online

    This week's challenge will be especially difficult.  Get ready.

    1. Attempt to survive without using any personal social networking tools for one week, Monday to Sunday.  Do not consult or post to Facebook.  Do not Tweet.  Do not answer personal emails (or even read them, if you can avoid it).  The only thing you are allowed to do is the minimum necessary online participation for other classes you are taking.
    2. Once the week is up (or once you've thrown in the towel if you don't make it to the end of the week), write about the experience on your discussion section wiki.  How do you end up communicating with people?  How do you coordinate meetings with your friends?  How do you survive without taking a Quiz On Your Favorite Star Wars Mini-Figure every hour?  You will want to create a separate wiki page for this so that others can easily comment on it. 
    3. Comment on at least one other student's write-up.
    4. Be thankful you weren't a college student before the early 1990s, like I was, when THERE WAS NO WORLD WIDE WEB!  (Gasp!)
    5. Please finish this online activity by next week's lecture.

    Readings

    1. Atsushi Akera, "Communities and specialized information businesses," in William Aspray and Paul E. Ceruzzi, eds., The Internet and American business (2008). PDF
    2. Ari Melber, "About Facebook," The Nation (07 January 2008). PDF

    Optional:

    • Lawrence Lessig, "Cyberspaces," in Code and other laws of cyberspace (1999). PDF
    • Andrew Chadwick, "The political economy of internet media," in Internet politics (2006). PDF
    • Langdon Winner, "Who will we be in cyberspace?" The Information Society (1996). PDF
    • Caroline Haythornthwaite and Barry Wellman, "The internet in everyday life: An introduction" (2002). PDF
    • Growing up online (60 min).  You may reach this film on the PBS web site PDF or through Google video PDF
    MONNovember 09 2009
     
    WEEK 11

    NEWOnline work

    Lecture

    Discussion

    • First five minutes: Quiz 08
    • Two student presentations on the readings (and two student extemporaneous responses).
    • Discuss this week's lecture and required readings. 
    • Turn in printed final version of paper #2.
    • After discussion section: Remember to post to your personal WordPress blog.

    Online
    This week you will explore the presence of casualized labor on the Interent -- and in real communities.

    1. Manpower Inc. is the world's largest temporary employment firm: "Manpower's worldwide network of 4,500 offices in 80 countries and territories enables the company to meet the needs of its 400,000 clients per year, including small and medium size enterprises in all industry sectors, as well as the world's largest multinational corporations."  Explore their web site a bit to get a sense of what this firm does.  (They even have a branch on Second Life ...)
    2. Now go to the US site for Manpower and do a job search in three different areas: (1) Madison, WI; (2) your hometown (or the city closest to your hometown); (2) a town or city you might like to someday live in. 

      (Hint: Leave the "Keyword(s)" field on the search page empty, but choose a specific state from the drop-down menu, click on a specific town in the "locations" list, and then click the ">" button to move that town into the search box.  Finally, click "Search.")

      What kind of technology skills do these jobs demand?  How many temporary vs. permanent jobs are listed?  Do these look like good jobs to you? 
    3. Write up a report of your findings, comparing the three places you investigated, for your discussion section wiki.  You will want to create a separate wiki page for this so that others can easily comment on it. 
    4. Comment on at least one other student's posting.
    5. Please finish this online activity by next week's lecture.

    Readings
    Please note that we're swapping this week's readings with next week's readings as they appear in your reader. The ones listed below are the ones you should do for this week!

    1. Frank Levy and Richard J. Murnane, "How computers change work and play," in The new division of labor: How computers are creating the next job market (2004). PDF
    2. Mark Deuze, "Creative industries, convergence culture, and media work," Media Work (2007). PDF

    Optional:

    • Karen Hossfeld, "'Their logic against them': Contradictions in sex, race, and class in Silicon Valley" (1990), in A. Nelson et al eds., Technicolor: Race, technology, and everyday life (2001). PDF
    • Janet W. Salaff, "Where home is the office: The new form of flexible work," in Barry Wellman and Caroline Haythornthwaite, eds., The internet in everyday life (2002). PDF
    • Amitava Kumar, "Temporary access: The Indian H-1B worker in the United States" (2001), in A. Nelson et al eds., Technicolor: Race, technology, and everyday life (2001). PDF

     

    MONNovember 16 2009
     
    WEEK 12

    NEWGames and avatars

    Lecture

    • Make sure your online activity from last week is finished by today.
    • Topic: Games as product, pastime, and social commentary PDF

    Discussion

    • First five minutes: Quiz 09
    • Two student presentations on the readings (and two student extemporaneous responses).
    • Discuss this week's lecture and required readings. 
    • Discuss your book slideshow or movie project.  Your TA will tell you where to find Flip Video cameras and how to use them.
    • Graded paper #2 handed back to students.
    • After discussion section: Remember to post to your personal WordPress blog.

    Online
    This week you'll explore the phenomenon of creating online characters representing human identity through textual or graphical means, called "avatars."

    1. Read this short selection from Neal Stephenson's early-1990s book Snow Crash in which the main character, Hiro Protagonist (get it?) visits an online world called the "Metaverse." 
    2. Now visit the Second Life web site and download the necessary software to create an avatar of your own.  Or if you're a member of another online community or online game (like "World of Warcraft") you may use an avatar from that system.  (Or you may want to simply create a rather cartoonish avatar like the ones available on the Nintendo Wii system, which you can do here.)
    3. Read through this photoessay on people and their cyberspace avatars from the New York Times and think about the different ways that people choose to represent themselves online. 
    4. Post a screen capture image of your Second Life, WoW, Wii, or other avatar to your discussion section wiki.    You will want to create a separate wiki page for this so that others can easily comment on it. 
    5. In the same posting to the wiki, write a bit about the process of creating this avatar. Did you try to represent yourself, or split from your real life persona?  Was it easy to create an avatar, or did you feel limited by the range of options?  How are race and gender and ethnicity and other markers of "difference" present or not present in your avatar?
    6. On the wiki, take a look at the other avatars your fellow students have posted, and comment on at least one of them. 
    7. Please finish this online activity by next week's lecture.

    Readings
    Please note that we're swapping this week's readings with last week's readings as they appear in your reader. The ones listed below are the ones you should do for this week!

    1. Peter Ludlow and Mark Wallace, "The Death of Urizenus," in The Second Life Herald: The virtual tabloid that witnessed the dawn of the metaverse (2007). PDF
    2. Brad King and John Borland, "Gamers, interrupted," in Dungeons and Dreamers: The rise of computer game culture from geek to chic (2003). PDF

      Optional:

    • Edward Castronova, "Daily life on a synthetic earth," in Synthetic worlds: The business and culture of online games (2005). PDF

     

    MONNovember 23 2009
     
    WEEK 13

    Online education

    Lecture

    • Make sure your online activity from last week is finished by today.
    • Topic: The university of the future? PDF

    Discussion
    All discussion sections cancelled for Thanksgiving.   Please cook your poultry to an appropriate temperature. 

    Online
    Last week you explored the world of temporary digital employment.   As we saw with Deborah Brandt's article in your reader a few weeks ago, employable expertise in literacy (and the technological tools for applying literacy) varies with historical circumstance.  This week you'll explore some of those circumstances.

    1. While you're on holiday for Thanksgiving, talk to a parent, aunt, uncle, grandparent, neighbor, employer, teacher, or other significant adult in your life, and ask them to describe for you the most important information technology they use (or once used) in their job.  (This doesn't have to be a digital information technology ... typewriters or stenography machines count.)  How did they first learn to use this technology?  How difficult was it to master?  How do they feel that this technology affected their working conditions — did it make them more or less productive?  Did it make them enjoy their job more or less? 
    2. Write up a report of your conversation on your discussion section wiki, and analyze what you heard with respect to this course and your own experiences.  You will want to create a separate wiki page for this so that others can easily comment on it. 
    3. Comment on at least one other student's posting.
    4. Please finish this online activity by next week's lecture.

    Readings

    1. Kurt Squire, "Open-ended video games: A model for developing learning for the interactive age," in Katie Salen, ed., The ecology of games: Connecting youth, games, and learning (2008). PDF
    2. Robert Darnton, "Google and the future of books," New York Review of Books (12 February 2009). PDF

    Optional:

    • Tamar Lewin, "Universities rush to set up outposts abroad," New York Times (10 Feb 2008). PDF
    • James Gee, "Good video games, the human mind, and good learning," in Good video games + good learning (2007). PDF
    • Larry Cuban, "Cyberteaching in preschools and kindergartens," in Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom (2001). PDF
    MONNovember 30 2009
     
    WEEK 14

    Digital divides and differences

    Lecture

    • Make sure your online activity from last week is finished by today.
    • Topic: Producing and reproducing the digital divide PDF

    Discussion section

    • Before section meets this week: Post an outline of your slideshow or movie presentation to your personal wiki page.
    • First five minutes: Quiz 10 (last one!)
    • Two student presentations on the readings (and two student extemporaneous responses).
    • Discuss this week's lecture and required readings. 

    Online
    This week you will try to discern someone's real identity from their online traces.

    1. Your TA will provide you with the address of the WordPress weblog of another student in a different discussion section.  Read through the student's weblog and find out everything you possibly can about the student. 
    2. Make assumptions based on what the student has written (and justify these assumptions). 
    3. You may try to track down the student's identity using other free, public online tools as well (describe how you use these tools). But beware, the student may be trying to trick you.
    4. Build a profile of this student and describe it on your discussion section wiki, along with a link to the weblog you were reviewing. 
    5. Email your TA when you have posted your profile, so your TA can alert the student you were profiling -- they can check your assumptions and findings and email you to tell you whether or not you were correct.
    6. Wait for an email from your TA with a student who may have been profiling you!  Were they accurate?
    7. Please finish this online activity by next week's lecture.

    Readings

    1. Lisa Nakamura, "Cybertyping and the work of race in the age of digital reproduction," in Cybertypes: Race, ethnicity, and identity on the Internet (2002). PDF
    2. Jody M. Roy, "Brotherhood of blood: Aryan tribalism and skinhead cybercrews," in Tyrone L. Adams and Stephen A. Smith, eds., Electronic tribes: The virtual worlds of geeks, gamers, shamans, and scammers (2008). PDF

    Optional:

    • Greg Downey, "Constructing closed-captioning in the public interest: From minority media accessibility to mainstream educational technology," info 9:2/3 (2007). PDF
    • Michael Zenos and Kirsten Foot, "Not your father's internet: The generation gap in online politics," in W. Lance Bennett, ed., Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth (2008). PDF
    MONDecember 07 2009
     
    WEEK 15

    Network security and the state

    Lecture

    • Make sure your online activity from last week is finished by today.
    • Topic TBAPDF

    Discussion
    Last discussion section!

    • Before section meets this week, you need to post your four-minute narrated slideshow or digital movie to the discussion section wiki. 
    • First five minutes: Make-up quiz!  (Only if you missed one of the regularly-scheduled quizzes with an excused absence.)
    • Start discussion with any make-up student presentations, if needed.
    • We'll take the rest of the section to screen each other's presentations and films, voting on which one is the best.  The slideshow and movie with the top votes from each section will advance to the LIS 201 Academy Awards, where an Elite Panel of Judges (the professor and his two kids) will decide which are the best.  The top film and slideshow will be presented to the whole class in lecture next week.  Maybe some runners-up too, if I'm in a good mood.
    • Last fifteen minutes: Fill out course evaluations (TA leaves room).

    Online
    Last online activity!  This week, you will discover how much information you can find out about yourself online.

    1. First, do a geodemographic marketing analysis on yourself, by searching online for data about the place where you live which someone might ascribe to you.  Here are some sites to start with:

    2. Next, do an individual profile analysis on yourself, by searching for online data specifically about you:

    3. Can you think of any other sites to search for which might provide either individual or aggregate data to help flesh out your "digital puppet"? 
    4. When you are finished searching these sites, create an entry on your discusion section wiki describing the person that a geodemographic firm would see when they look for "you".  What do you think about this representation of your existence?  You will want to create a separate wiki page for this so that others can easily comment on it. 
    5. Comment on at least one other student's posting for this assignment.
    6. Please finish this online activity by next week's lecture.

    Readings
    Last readings!

    1. Ad Hoc Committee on the Triple Revolution, "The Triple Revolution: Cybernation, Weaponry, Human Rights" (1964).PDF
    2. Robert Dreyfuss, "Iran's green wave," The Nation (01 July 2009).PDF

    Optional:

    • Benjamin Barber, "The old economy and the birth of a new McWorld," in Jihad vs. McWorld (2001). PDF
    • Cees Hamelink, "The decent society and cyberspace," in The ethics of cyberspace (2000). PDF
    • James Deane, "The other information revolution: Media and empowerment in developing countries," in Bruce Girard and Seán Ó Siochrú, Communicating in the information society (2003).PDF
    MONDecember 14 2009
     
    WEEK 16

    Assessing the information society

    Lecture
    Last lecture!

    • Make sure your online activity from last week is finished by today.
    • Wrap-up and review for final exam.
    • Screening of the top student slideshow and digital film (plus maybe a runner-up or two).
    • This week I will distribute a list of terms and essay questions to study which will help you prepare for our final exam next week.  (I will probably distribute these on our course news weblog.)

    Discussion
    All discussion sections are cancelled this week. 

    • However, you still need to post your final 1000-word book review to your discussion wiki page this week.

    Online 
    No online assignment this week.  But you may wish to use your discussion section wiki to hold a study session for the final exam ...

    Readings
    No readings this week.
    Review what you've learned.

    Final exam week

    The final exam for this course will be held on Wednesday, December 23, 2009, from 12:25pm-2:25pm.  Room TBA (but most likely the normal lecture hall).

    The final exam will consist of five short answer questions worth one point each ("identify and give the significance of") and one essay question worth five points.  Sample terms and essay questions for you to study will be posted on the course news weblog.  You may comment on these postings to share ideas with other students in a virtual review session.

       

     

    LAST UPDATED October 29, 2009 by gdowney @ wisc.edu